This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bigtimepeace (talk | contribs) at 18:48, 31 December 2009 (→December 2009: further explanation). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:48, 31 December 2009 by Bigtimepeace (talk | contribs) (→December 2009: further explanation)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Leave me a message here. Wikiidemon (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- HI ROBERT GIDA!!!--Misortie (talk) 17:58, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, evil twin! - Wikidemon (talk) 18:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
December 2009
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 18:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Wikiidemon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand nothing. I registered today and after two edits you deleted me, but why? I explained my username's choice (my second edit on Obama's page) and wikipedia accepted it when I registered it, what more could I do? Tell it to me!Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand nothing. I registered today and after two edits you deleted me, but why? I explained my username's choice (my second edit on Obama's page) and wikipedia accepted it when I registered it, what more could I do? Tell it to me! |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand nothing. I registered today and after two edits you deleted me, but why? I explained my username's choice (my second edit on Obama's page) and wikipedia accepted it when I registered it, what more could I do? Tell it to me! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand nothing. I registered today and after two edits you deleted me, but why? I explained my username's choice (my second edit on Obama's page) and wikipedia accepted it when I registered it, what more could I do? Tell it to me! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Wikiidemon (talk) 18:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Explain http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Aabckr_Aabmo. J.delanoyadds 18:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Your explanation for your username is not remotely credible. You showed up on one article talk page heavily edited by an editor with a user name one character different from the one you chose. That's not a coincidence, and regardless you simply cannot have a username that almost perfectly mimicks that of an established editor. The fact that it seems likely that you are a sock of a blocked editor only adds to the reason for blocking, but the unacceptable (and clearly stalkerish) user name is reason enough. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 18:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)