Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Snakes~enwiki (talk | contribs) at 23:52, 1 January 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

1. Thanks for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- King of Hearts 06:36, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

2. 

   Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - 山本一郎 06:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
3. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. -- King of Hearts 06:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
4. This message is regarding the page Qur'an desecration. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:22, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

I am reverting vandalism:

There is no article for "guru granth sahib desecration", "bible desecration", "torah desecration" or indeed any articles for any other holy books of other religions - Islam has no more right to have a separate article than any other, why is it given special treatment over all others on Misplaced Pages? --66.246.246.254 23:26, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Erasing an article you disagree with is NOT "reverting vandalism". If you feel it is unfair that a bible desecration article does not exist, then start one. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

No, I disagree that special articles are made for the Islamic version when no others exist: There is simply no reason for that article to be merged with Qur'an: It is just another aspect of the book and the very title of the article "Qur'an desecration is POV as it implies that the book is holy when to most of the world it is not. I would not expect other religious books to have the title "Holy whatever" either --66.246.246.254 23:30, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Discuss it on the talk page then, do not fallaciously describe your edits as "reverting vandalism" when that is clearly not what you are doing. You have been warned. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:32, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --NaconKantari 23:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --Snakes 23:52, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. (WHOIS  Geolocate  Proxy Checker Current blocks XTools Global contributions) (RIRs: Africa America Asia-Pacific Europe Latin America/Caribbean)