Misplaced Pages

User talk:Andrewjlockley

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 12:52, 27 December 2009 (Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Andrewjlockley/Archive 2.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:52, 27 December 2009 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Andrewjlockley/Archive 2.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
  • I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
⇒ Start a new Talk topic.


Archives
Archive 1Archive 2


This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

SmackBot suggestions

Hi Andrew, thanks for the note. SamckBot is run on a batch basis so most of this stuff would be difficult, however there is a COIbot that looks for autobiographical articles.

It would however be possible to tag for lack of inline citations, and maybe lack of references. Rich Farmbrough, 09:24 15 January 2009 (UTC).

Warnings

Re: Editing talk comments

Hello, Andrewjlockley. You have new messages at Awickert's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Andrewjlockley. You have new messages at Oren0's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Deletein of ADRECS

Hi Andrew, can you tell me why the ADRECS article should be deleted - the Claverton Web site where it sits is an independent site comprised largely of energy experts and professionals. It is at least an interesting idea, and if feasible highly significant.

Kind Regards

enginemanEngineman (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Because it's not WP:NOTABLE. It's just someone's idea. There's no backing for it, it's not under serious consideration by anyone significant and there are no papers published on it. It might be brilliant, but that's not grounds for inclusion in WP. It seems like a lot of your stuff gets deleted, so why don't you spend some time working out where you're going wrong and change? Andrewjlockley (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)