This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ajh16 (talk | contribs) at 17:55, 26 January 2010 (→Thanks for the revert on my user page: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:55, 26 January 2010 by Ajh16 (talk | contribs) (→Thanks for the revert on my user page: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Amaury is
Somewhere
It is currently 04:13 where I am
I screwed up, just to say hello, or anything else! I won't bite! I have a few requests that I hope you'll respect while posting here:
|
For 2009 discussions, please visit the following link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Zhang_He/2009
January 2010
You and overly aggressive editing and commentary
I will repeat here comments I made on
"Timberframe's edits and justification were correct. It was nothing remotely like a person attack. "find another hobby" was a little flippant, but wasn't offensive, and largely to the point for those with thick skins. Zhang He, your comment previous to Timberframes' edit, "If that's true, then the same can be said for the YouTube and Twitter links. Do not remove again." shows a lack of understanding of Misplaced Pages policy, and makes an unjustified implied threat."
You were both incorrect and offensive. Piano non troppo (talk) 14:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Ishik university
Hey there!!!
It might not be a mistake but you tagged this article with CSD G7 whereas I do not think that the author request deletion. If possible look into this.
Ciao!!!
Hitro talk 07:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- It was already tagged that, but it was vandalized, so I reverted it to a cleaner version, but I reverted too far, so I re-tagged it. - Zhang He (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
User:Pinkmefe
Thank you for helping with CSD tagging, but the tagging of this editor's user page as vandalism was incorrect. User pages are given a certain amount of leeway. It is just an excitable girl making her first edits on Misplaced Pages, not vandalism. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- I thought it was an article. My apologies. - Zhang He (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
I appreciate your catching my typo here. Schmidt, 20:21, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome. - Zhang He (talk) 23:51, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism accusations
Read before reverting and accusing. --IP69.226.103.13 | Talk about me. 17:32, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Check your talk page. - Zhang He (talk) 17:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Apology accepted. I was swearing. But your reversions and accusations of vandalism helped me realize what I had thought at first, Bwilkins' words were grossly inappropriate for anywhere and anytime on wikipedia. Thanks. --IP69.226.103.13 | Talk about me. 17:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Lol, what?
What was this revert for? IP69.226.103.13 is an established contributor. Sure his username can be... confusing, but that wasn't vandalism. The Thing Vandalize me 17:33, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, now that I go back on it, I realize I was wrong. I misunderstood the edits and thought he was the one swearing. It was never his name, though. My apologies. - Zhang He (talk) 17:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
User page
NP. I do the same thing. I noticed someone reverting. Look at my user page and see that they were the third person in a week. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 17:42, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Regarding links
you do not place links to use as information. especially from an unreliable source as PSUpedia. Links are used as external links and sometimes refernces if it's on the exact page. it is not used as a substitute of information to lead you to another page.Bread Ninja (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- PSUPedia is not unreliable, and if that's the case, then the same can be said for Misplaced Pages.
If you remove them again, you'll be warned. - Zhang He (talk) 22:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- PSUpedia does not hold reliable sources, it's all based upon fans giving information, PSUpedia even allows trivia where as Misplaced Pages strictly is against it, that is the very reason why PSUpedia is an unreliable source, unlike Misplaced Pages. and the whole point is to fix Misplaced Pages into having sources and to allow it to become a reliable source of information. it's like placing Wikia in here, and other wiki's simply because those other "pedia's" claim to be a reliable source. First of all, those are primary sources that merely claim and have no way to back it up, that needs to be backed up by secondary and third sources in order to be verifiable.
- second, you clearly do not understand how to place information. you do not put up links up to allow another site giving us information about the characters. instead Misplaced Pages should have the information and have references to back it up. you do not put up links, ever. Unless you put them as external links or as refs, you do know how to put refs in do you?
- Third, the information is simply trivial on all counts and if it was kept it would make the article in an In-universe style.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- The links are useful. Misplaced Pages does not have the templates to support those things.
I've just warned you on your talk page. Do it again and you will be reported. - Zhang He (talk) 16:08, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- what are you talking about? links should be used to a minimum. Do you know anything about rules? again the list of NPC's are clearly trivial, and should not be mentioned in such a form. If it were kept the article would be an in-universe style. ALSO you are using the links improperly and you know it. Misplaced Pages clearly speaks about in-universe style and trivia and how it should not be used. Please look at this. and there are many other things you could possibly be accused of.Misplaced Pages:Don't be inconsiderate. Look at WP:ELNO this article is a nutshell, meaning it's the official guide on how to use links. Instead, of reporting me right away, be considerate and discuss it in the discussion section, if you have a problem, then discuss it in the discussion section.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, fine. For now, though, let's leave them up until a resolution has been made. - Zhang He (talk) 16:37, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, WP:ELNO, already said to avoid using links about other Wiki's. and since it's an actual wiki-guide, we should enforce it.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- There are exceptions, so just leave them up until a resolution has been made. You must really want to get on my bad side. And, please, when you reply, format your replies with the proper amount of "colons". - Zhang He (talk) 16:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, there are certain exceptions, but in order for exceptions to occur there needs to be certain situations that differentiate from the common one, which in this case holds none. Unless you have any proof of how PSUpedia be an exception, than it might be taken to consideration, but not likely. besides, it is said to keep links to a minimum. Also the list of NPCs is really not necessary and is considered trivial. No other article related to games formats there characters like this and i don't know why this one is formatted as such. and no I'm not trying to get on your bad side. you are clearly new or someone who has not read all the guidelines. please consider good faith and that I'm not attacking you personally. and again, the article is not using those links properly. even if they were reliable.Bread Ninja (talk) 17:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- No, I am not new. I've been here since December 30th, 2008. - Zhang He (talk) 17:24, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- you should know most of the rules by now then. anyways....there are more than enough reason to remove it, the list is in-universe, trivial, and of course using improper links. many people have removed it in the past and for some reason it just keeps coming back, now i know the reason why it keeps coming back.Bread Ninja (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are correct. I do know the rules, which means you should not be questioning me or arguing with me. - Zhang He (talk) 01:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- And it's all the more reason why you should listen to me. you should know them by now, you are being over zealous and not even trying to back up your reason for keeping it. Also i'm not trying to get on your "bad side" there an article for that too for those who take things too personally, do you want me to show it to you or do you want to learn that this isnt personal on your own? either way the majority of what your going is by WP:ILIKEITBread Ninja (talk) 15:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- No offense, but you should actually be listenting you me. Let's look at our join dates, shall we? Let's see here... I joined December 30th, 2008; you joined May 1st, 2009. Hey, what do you know? It looks like I've been here longer than you. Again, no offense, but it's the truth. - Zhang He (talk) 15:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, but join date doesn't really mean spit (see WP:MOREX). What's far more important is what is more in-line with policy. I joined December 20, 2007, but that doesn't mean that if I gave an opinion here, that everyone should automatically agree with me, or if someone who joined before me swooped in, we should automatically agree with him/her. Apparition /Mistakes 16:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- No offense, but you should actually be listenting you me. Let's look at our join dates, shall we? Let's see here... I joined December 30th, 2008; you joined May 1st, 2009. Hey, what do you know? It looks like I've been here longer than you. Again, no offense, but it's the truth. - Zhang He (talk) 15:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- And it's all the more reason why you should listen to me. you should know them by now, you are being over zealous and not even trying to back up your reason for keeping it. Also i'm not trying to get on your "bad side" there an article for that too for those who take things too personally, do you want me to show it to you or do you want to learn that this isnt personal on your own? either way the majority of what your going is by WP:ILIKEITBread Ninja (talk) 15:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are correct. I do know the rules, which means you should not be questioning me or arguing with me. - Zhang He (talk) 01:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- you should know most of the rules by now then. anyways....there are more than enough reason to remove it, the list is in-universe, trivial, and of course using improper links. many people have removed it in the past and for some reason it just keeps coming back, now i know the reason why it keeps coming back.Bread Ninja (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- No, I am not new. I've been here since December 30th, 2008. - Zhang He (talk) 17:24, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, there are certain exceptions, but in order for exceptions to occur there needs to be certain situations that differentiate from the common one, which in this case holds none. Unless you have any proof of how PSUpedia be an exception, than it might be taken to consideration, but not likely. besides, it is said to keep links to a minimum. Also the list of NPCs is really not necessary and is considered trivial. No other article related to games formats there characters like this and i don't know why this one is formatted as such. and no I'm not trying to get on your bad side. you are clearly new or someone who has not read all the guidelines. please consider good faith and that I'm not attacking you personally. and again, the article is not using those links properly. even if they were reliable.Bread Ninja (talk) 17:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- There are exceptions, so just leave them up until a resolution has been made. You must really want to get on my bad side. And, please, when you reply, format your replies with the proper amount of "colons". - Zhang He (talk) 16:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, WP:ELNO, already said to avoid using links about other Wiki's. and since it's an actual wiki-guide, we should enforce it.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, fine. For now, though, let's leave them up until a resolution has been made. - Zhang He (talk) 16:37, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- what are you talking about? links should be used to a minimum. Do you know anything about rules? again the list of NPC's are clearly trivial, and should not be mentioned in such a form. If it were kept the article would be an in-universe style. ALSO you are using the links improperly and you know it. Misplaced Pages clearly speaks about in-universe style and trivia and how it should not be used. Please look at this. and there are many other things you could possibly be accused of.Misplaced Pages:Don't be inconsiderate. Look at WP:ELNO this article is a nutshell, meaning it's the official guide on how to use links. Instead, of reporting me right away, be considerate and discuss it in the discussion section, if you have a problem, then discuss it in the discussion section.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- The links are useful. Misplaced Pages does not have the templates to support those things.
Thanks for the revert on my user page
Though I did kind of like the "Stop undoing my edits" badge of honor... Must be doing something right. ;) Ajh16 (talk) 17:55, 26 January 2010 (UTC)