This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.248.71.72 (talk) at 10:11, 6 February 2010 (→Die Antwoord). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:11, 6 February 2010 by 74.248.71.72 (talk) (→Die Antwoord)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Die Antwoord
AfDs for this article:- Die Antwoord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable bandspam. Orange Mike | Talk 03:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Seems like I'm not completely off the wiki-planet after all... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 03:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Notability was established pretty thoroughly in the last AFD debate. Just because you have not heard of something or do not appreciate its significance does not mean that it is not notable. Does the article need a lot of work? Definitely. But articles that need work should be tagged appropriately (which it has been), not deleted. Misplaced Pages is a work in progress, and if every article that were inadequately sourced were deleted, few quality articles would ever be written. -zorblek (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Die Antwoord has enough Google results that they pass a basic sniff test for notability. Half a million Youtube views (for three videos) in 72 hours makes them no less notable than internet memes that have their own Misplaced Pages entry. 74.248.71.72 (talk) 10:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)