This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Timotheus Canens (talk | contribs) at 04:27, 21 February 2010 (→Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: endorse for CU attention). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:27, 21 February 2010 by Timotheus Canens (talk | contribs) (→Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: endorse for CU attention)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Scibaby
Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/1
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/2
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/3
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.
Report date February 20 2010, 23:52 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- BC Builder (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Prolog
A common Scibaby pattern. Prolog (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status –
Endorsed for Checkuser attention. Requested by Prolog (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed Tim Song (talk) 04:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Categories: