This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mathsci (talk | contribs) at 09:36, 28 March 2010 (→Your squabble with another user). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:36, 28 March 2010 by Mathsci (talk | contribs) (→Your squabble with another user)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Your squabble with another user
Hello. It's pretty clear that you are deliberately trying to get a rise out of User:Mathsci. He's been around here a lot longer than you have and deserves some leeway. Just drop it. Rhomb (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Two groundless failed SPI cases; one groundless failed ANI case; stalking me at Topological group, Lagrange's theorem (group theory), Index of a subgroup, Thomas Octavius Prichard, Semigroup. Threats, abuse, insults, groundless accusations repeated ad nauseam. Are my edits to Herbrand quotient "creepy"? Semigroup? Garside element? John Brinkley (astronomer)? William Frend (social reformer)? Bewick Bridge? No. All this because I asked a polite question about copyrights and spotted a foolish mistake. And you want me to give this person "leeway"! Quotient group (talk) 21:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
FYI
A checkuser has determined that Quotient group (talk · contribs), Matilda (talk · contribs) and Maud (talk · contribs) are very likely sockpuppets of A.K.Nole (talk · contribs); and that Dewey process (talk · contribs) and Rhomb (talk · contribs) are probably sockpuppets of Mister Collins (talk · contribs). The information from checkuser will now be passed onto a member of the arbitration committee and some accounts might be blocked as a consequence. Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 09:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)