Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alkivar (talk | contribs) at 18:52, 20 January 2006 (→[]: barely keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Neal Weaver

The president of a diploma mill, posted by a student there.

• Delete. A.J.A. 05:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep. Editor has nominated 8 Christian biography entries for deletion, today. It's hard to assume good faith. Neal Weaver is the president of Louisiana Baptist University. Obviously, keep. --Jason Gastrich 05:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

The only thing obvious is that you would want to keep it. --Q

• • Watch Out Potential branchstacking : .Blnguyen 02:09, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

And author has created dozens of articles on complete nonentities, largely connected to this diploma mill. - Just zis  Guy, you know? / AfD? 23:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

So, are AfDs to be top-secret now or something? This one doesn't seem worth throwing in my vote, but I don't see a problem with telling people of an ongoing vote. Rogue 9 10:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Editor's number of deletion nominations is not an indicator of bad faith simply because it bothers another editor. Weaver is the President of a college with a Wiki entry--not unreasonable to keep, but alleged acts that might make him notable as a group are unverified and claimed without citation. Vote changed. - WarriorScribe 05:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

comment question being whether merely being the president of a college warrants a separate article.Mark K. Bilbo 19:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

You're right...I was a tad hasty in writing the comment and left off some stuff. Assuming that the information in the article is correct, I think that it's possible that Weaver is trying to turn LBU into a more reputable institution. His policies probably had a hand in student growth. Mind you, personally, I still think it's a diploma mill, but less because they sell diplomas and more because they don't really educate anyone. If he had as much to do with the rewriting of the minimum educational standards for Ohio Christian schools, that might qualify, along with his presiding over a pretty significant growth of the Gospel Music Network. All of those things together might be reasonably notable, if true. It's just occurred to me, however, that if someone wrote those kinds of things about someone Gastrich didn't like, he'd demand a "citation." We've seen that enough times. If Gastrich doesn't like or doesn't agree with the comments or information, he demands citations, yet posts most of his claims about his personal heroes without providing much in the way of proof. There are no citations for any of the claims about Weaver. I'm convinced. Dump it. - WarriorScribe 02:14, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. hius qualifications are from a diploma mill. self-styled religious leader.Blnguyen 06:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable enough. A list of publications would be a big improvement. Logophile 07:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. President of the LBU is perhaps a measure of notability for some, though I personally disagree that being at the head of a notable organisation makes one notable oneself. Very little proof that any of the article's other claims are true or notable, unsurprising given his credentials. --Malthusian (talk) 09:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Being a President of a university does not make one notable. --Pierremenard 11:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable president of a degree-by-mail diploma mill. And just a comment ... it's kind of funny how I keep running into Jason Gastrich. We first met on talk.origins, then I talked to him on AIM, then we ran into each here on evolution. He's a nice enough guy; I just don't think the subject of this article he created is notable. Cyde Weys 2M-VOTE 16:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Easy Delete - not notable, the LBU article contains sufficient information about him. -Harvestdancer 17:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. Mark K. Bilbo 19:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This article was created by Jason Gastrich to promote his school as a mainstream institution. This is only one of around 10 articles he created promoting his religion/degree/school. See List_of_Louisiana_Baptist_University_people. --Q
• Strong keep President of a university, and published author B.ellis 21:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per WarriorScribe, but I would appreciate it if the author of this article could provide references for the two books and "numerous articles" written by this figure. Hall Monitor 22:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete is president of an "unaccredited institute of higher learning" (i.e. a diploma mill), not a university Author is the infamous Jason Gastrich (talk · contribs). Just zis  Guy, you know? / AfD? 22:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this and award the closing admin a degree from the institution for his efforts. Eusebeus 23:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone but Gastrich and his socks. KillerChihuahua 00:11, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 02:17, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete--nixie 04:47, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• keep Published author, president of a uni, what more do we need? If you guys keep it up, wikipedia will only have a few dosen articles! Brokenfrog 20:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Being an official for a non-accredited university isn't sufficient claim for notability, and the Library of Congress has no record of him as an author. -Colin Kimbrell 21:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep university-related topics are notable. Cynical 21:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into main institution article if notable enough to mention, otherwise delete. bcatt 22:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Devein 23:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --kingboyk 23:10, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep per nom... because being the President of, what seems to be a notable non-accredited (fringe) school, I think would qualify one as notable. Although it looks as though it will be deleted, I may appeal this. So what if LOC doesn't have him as an author? I think it important to have articles on key officials of schools/school wannabes/scams alike. Either way, he seems notable enough. - RoyBoy 03:45, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

If it is kept for that reason it should be merged with LBU. Afterall other than LBU's link at the bottom there are no sources. As for the place where he got 3 out of 4 of his non-LBU related degrees (Baptist Christian University is LBU), do a search for that school, "Eastern Baptist Institute." That will tell you something about this person. As for the Korean awards, ect. there are no sources. The claims about his church are uncited. Outside of the figures LBU gives we don't know how many people this guy is notable to. More importantly if LBU barely escaped its own deletion, why should its "President" who has 5 unaccredited degrees, unknown books/readers and uncited awards get his own. Yes, it is important to have some facts about the "President," but if this article is only to be a selling point for LBU/LBU related, relevant facts should be merged the rest deleted. ---Filler

I appreciate (and encourage) your attention to detail, but I'm the Admin who locked the LBU article and had the distinct pleasure of wading through the NewsGroupish debating/bickering to try and get it moving forward. So I'm familiar with the situation... too familiar. :"D You're making a good case for a merge, but I felt my vote here needed to be strong enough to stem the tide... as misguided as that was. It will likely be merged; by me. RoyBoy 08:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Subject is not very notable, but the article can still be of use if kept NPOV. For me, limited notability doesn't not automatically warrant deletion. ··· rWd · Talk ··· 07:34, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. If WikiMedia Foundation sets up a fully linked in WikiBiography, I would support moving these minor notables over to it. Until then, they have enough connection with people, organizations, and issues to keep around. --StuffOfInterest 12:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Definitely keep Might need a bit of cleaning up, but looks appropiate for a Misplaced Pages article. Article is informative, subject is notable. Is someone trying to wipe the name LBU off the face of the earth? - The Great Gavini

• Strong Keep This is a perfectly viable encyclopedia article on a public institution that could very well be the subject of someone's research in the future. In such an event, wikipedia would come in handy. That is what wikipedia is for. I haven't heard a single good argument to why this should be deleted. When you found a university, you can post about its notaries too. Until then, stfu. Itake 15:04, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: per nom. Justin Eiler 16:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Keep President of a University (whether or not is a "Diploma Mill" is irrelevant. Discuss such in Article or fix POV), Published AuthorWynler 17:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep same as above. --Yonghokim 17:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep I see little reason to delete this article. --Shanedidona 17:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep notable enough. Lerner 18:08, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep barely squeeks by WP:BIO imo.  ALKIVAR™ 18:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)