Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Syrthiss (talk | contribs) at 19:49, 20 January 2006 (→Petros471: +my two cents). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Neokid

This user is currently not on Misplaced Pages.

Userboxes

I checked out the situation in both browsers, in numerous skins, but couldn't see anything out of the ordinary.  :? --King of All the Franks 19:09, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

RE: If anyone else sees the same thing, please tell me. The page is User:Merovingian/Userboxes.

Hi

Hi. You may not have noticed this yet but there is also an encyclopedia on en.wikipedia.org. I see that you have over 150 contributions but have not worked on any articles yet. Allow me to invite you to participate by using the "Random article" button on your left. silsor 23:09, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

RE: Correct. This is because I recently changed my username from Theneokid to The Neokid. I am currently pondering what subjects I could improve. Thank you anyway.

Archiving

Quite right! Wally 22:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

RE: Glad to be of service.

My Sandbox Guardian

Why, thank you; unfortunately those were my edits, but I'll be sure to log in next time. I didn't exactly have time, as I am in the middle of class, but it's always nice to know that someone out there is watching over the little unknown parts of me userspace page. For that, I award you thusly:

The Neokid has earned a Cernen's Plusbox for vigilantly guarding my sandbox from vandals and trolls and other ne'er-do-wells

watching my user page

thanks -- it looks like my actual brother is editing my page, so it's not actual vandalism, more of a sibling prank, which is fine with me. I appreciate the looking. (Regarding User:Theinfo ) Theinfo 20:44, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Re:Your Userpage

Yeh, I guess he/she didn't like me reverting their vandalism :) Don't worry I don't get upset at stuff like that, and better that they mess around with my userpage until the inevitable block comes (I'd already reported at AIAV) rather than a 'proper' article. Still it would have been nice to have had the pleasure of doing the block myself... (can't as not admin). Petros471 18:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Re:RfA

Hey, I'm honoured that you've decided to nominate me, however I'm not sure I can accept at this time. To be honest having the admin tools would be really handy, but I think most people voting on WP:RFA are looking for more experience than I've got. I'll ask one or two of the RFA regulars to check. Thanks again, and I'll get back to you. Petros471 19:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Petros471

Hmm.. well as much as I respect this user, in my opinion less than 1000 edits possibly isn't enough to get a good response on the RfA. I'll leave voting and everything for now, but I'll see how it goes. I certainly won't oppose this user. — FireFox • T • 19:07, 20 January 2006

RE: Petros471 has the skill, but just needs the opportunity. The above message was not transferred to FireFox's talk page.

Pardon me for wikisnooping, but I'm also afraid that while I see nothing but good faith in your nomination I'm worried that it is way too soon for Petros471. Most people will automatically oppose on the basis of edit counts and time spent. You both are of course welcome to try, but when RFAs go south they tend to really go south...and if Petros471 would normally be a shoe in after 3 months, some people will hold it against him/her for trying again too soon. A failure here would likely lead to not being able to successfully pass a nomination until 3+ months from now. Anyways, thats my $0.02 wikistalking (tho I'm wikistalking neokid, not petros471) cents. :) --Syrthiss 19:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)