This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hammersoft (talk | contribs) at 03:29, 31 May 2010 (→Misplaced Pages:Non-free content criteria). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:29, 31 May 2010 by Hammersoft (talk | contribs) (→Misplaced Pages:Non-free content criteria)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Rollback
Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
- Rollback gives you access to certain tools, including Huggle, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
- Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
- Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
- Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
- Please read Help:Reverting and Misplaced Pages:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
- You can test Rollback at Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback
- You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page
- If you have any questions, please do let me know.
--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:34, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Your revert to my edit
You reverted my edit to Erysimum insulare. I'm quite used to this. It looks odd, but it had a useful purpose. Not to go into too much detail (unless you ask), the page for Category:Erysimum (that is, the genus that this plant belongs to) was alphabetized in several different ways, leading to the page showing three consecutive alphabets. OK, that's somewhat oversimplified. But I'm trying to put the Category page for the genus into one consistent alphabet. That means going to the article for each species that's in faulty order and editing the statement of category. I've done this for many genera category pages. Several times, I've been thanked for clearing up the page. When I've been reverted, I've explained matters. And in every single instance, the person who reverted me has seen my point and encouraged me to continue my efforts. 71.126.140.136 (talk) 00:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)Stephen Kosciesza
sry
Sorry about that accidental revert back to the vandalism diff, huggle was being a bit laggy and the page showed the vandalism diff, and when i clicked revert, it reverted Tide Roll's edits. Once again, I apologize. --Seahorseruler 00:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 00:46, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Non-free content criteria
So I'm wondering how many times you have to be shown Misplaced Pages:Non-free content criteria before you agree to abide by its terms? You've been shown not just once, but twice before. Yet, despite this you decided to add File:Star Trek - Photon torpedoes.jpg to User:Alpha Quadrant/Editnotice, and also to Portal:Star Trek/Selected picture/3. Why? Are you unclear on this policy? Are you not understanding what non-free content is? Do you not understand the difference between user space, portal space, article space? There's no wiggle room on this policy. You can not host non-free content on anything but actual encyclopedia articles. Are you clear about this? You may consider this a final warning. --Hammersoft (talk) 03:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
