This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gyrofrog (talk | contribs) at 16:59, 12 July 2010 (fmormat; + comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:59, 12 July 2010 by Gyrofrog (talk | contribs) (fmormat; + comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Somalia
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review
I've listed this article for peer review because… Basically, I think this article has some strong points but suffers a real focus problem, particularly for a country article. Some of "the regulars" on this page disagree, they dispute that there is any problem with it. I think I have given some pretty concrete ways I think the article could improve on the talk page, but have encountered resistance on every point. I'd just like some outside opinions on the matter. Thanks a lot, TastyCakes (talk) 14:45, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- This my my opinion the Somalia article is very well written article focusing all important and interesting facts of Somalia and that why there is no problem with it. There no need to change because its a quality article. Wikiplayer13 (talk)
- On a related note, see also: WP:RS/N#Somalia - Transparency International and Somali news sites. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC)