This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bogdangiusca (talk | contribs) at 11:41, 23 January 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:41, 23 January 2006 by Bogdangiusca (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Why the article split?
I am just wondering. Was it simply to pull the content people were not arguing about out and put it somewhere? It does not leave very much in the other article. Dalf | Talk 11:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Because this part is getting very long. The other article is supposed to talk about Moldovan, the current official language of Moldova and what happend hundreds of years ago is only marginally relevant to that article. bogdan 11:28, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, seems like a good reason. Sometimes I think people split articles too quickly or for bad reasons. A lot of the best featured articles are quite long. But there does seem to be a good argument for having them seperate. Does the article on ROmanian also link here? I think a line or two mentioning Moldova and a like here (and there) might be worthwhile. Dalf | Talk 11:33, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- I put a link in Romanian language. It should link eventually have a link in the history section, but currently that section has little on the modern history of Romanian language. bogdan 11:41, 23 January 2006 (UTC)