This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cirt (talk | contribs) at 04:45, 24 August 2010 (note.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:45, 24 August 2010 by Cirt (talk | contribs) (note.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Shutterbug
Shutterbug (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Shutterbug/Archive.
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
24 August 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
- AlexJohnTorres12 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- JessaRinaldi (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Whoismarty (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Johnalexwood (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Monsignore (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- MrSimmonds (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Jimgreensboro (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Jbsweden9 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Fairyday (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Cirt
Block evasion. Violation of multiple sections of WP:ARBSCI, notably restrictions on multiple accounts, and restrictions on use of open proxies and disclosure of Church of Scientology-controlled IPs and managed sock accounts.
- AlexJohnTorres12 (talk · contribs) -- spam/promo at article on leader of Church of Scientology, example includes,
- JessaRinaldi (talk · contribs) -- Blocked for violations of WP:BLP policy, on page on critic of Scientology,
- Whoismarty (talk · contribs) -- Blocked for violations of WP:BLP on Scientology critic article page,
- Johnalexwood (talk · contribs) -- Prior block for use of non reliable sources on WP:BLP pages within Scientology topic,
- Monsignore (talk · contribs) -- Removal of links to subject's website, on article about Scientology critic,
- MrSimmonds (talk · contribs) -- Removal of subject's own blog from article about subject, who is a Scientology critic
- Jimgreensboro (talk · contribs) -- Additions of primary-sourced-Church of Scientology-material and promotional webpages, to article on Scientology spokesperson
- Jbsweden9 (talk · contribs) -- Blocked, for using Misplaced Pages for spam/advertising, removing critical content about Scientology across multiple pages
- Fairyday (talk · contribs) -- Page blanking, removal of sourced (critical) content from Scientology article, example,
Most likely that most, if not all, of these accounts, have used forms of technical IP usage which violates WP:ARBSCI. -- Cirt (talk) 04:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Note: If not Shutterbug (talk · contribs), some of these accounts may also be tied with technical data correlations to another sockmaster on Scientology topic, that of banned user DavidYork71 (talk · contribs). -- Cirt (talk) 04:18, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Confirmed the following as one user:
- AlexJohnTorres12 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- JessaRinaldi (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Also Confirmed the following as one user:
- MrSimmonds (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Mike Greenwood (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Monsignore (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Jimgreensboro (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
It appears that these two groups of users are Unrelated. No open proxies as far as I can tell, just a lot of mobile editing, which makes it harder to connect the accounts to each other. The first group of users could be related to Shutterbug based on geolocation of IPs, but again, it's nothing concrete. Fairyday (talk · contribs) appears Unrelated to any of the above users, but could be Shutterbug based on location. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 04:32, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like nishkid forgot to mark as checked. NativeForeigner /Contribs 04:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the CU investigation checks. This is clear violation of WP:ARBSCI. -- Cirt (talk) 04:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Note: The behavior and modus operandi of the above-checked-accounts, combined with likely technical data correlations, shows a pattern similar to that from the WP:ARBSCI evidence, namely, Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/COFS#Update:_Additional_confirmations_in_COFS_checkuser_case and Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/COFS/Evidence#Checkuser_evidence_shows_common_use_of_multiple_IP_addresses.2C_some_open_proxies.2C_some_CoS_owned_IPs. -- Cirt (talk) 04:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the CU investigation checks. This is clear violation of WP:ARBSCI. -- Cirt (talk) 04:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Categories: