This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mr-Natural-Health (talk | contribs) at 23:35, 22 May 2004 (Preliminary review of Orthomolecular medicine). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:35, 22 May 2004 by Mr-Natural-Health (talk | contribs) (Preliminary review of Orthomolecular medicine)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)It was actually me, Lumos3, who created this page but somehow I became logged off during the session and it didnt get recorded.
Preliminary review of Orthomolecular medicine
My preliminary review of Orthomolecular medicine is totally unfavorable.
The primary problem seems to be that this article is nothing but a stub article hiding behind a lot of verbiage. Major portions of the Orthomolecular medicine viewpoint are simply not documented in this article. I got absolutely nothing out of this article other than a bunch of commonly held generalities..
The article states: The substances may be administered by diet, dietary supplementation or intravenously, for example. What is that supposed to mean? I have no idea. As far as I know, diet has absolutely nothing to do with Orthomolecular medicine. Intravenous treatments would seem to require professionalized care, while dietary supplementation says self-care.
This article totally fails SQG#3. The proponent's viewpoint is largely missing. No wonder that opponents have yet to attack this article. There is nothing to prove or attack as it is presently written. -- John Gohde 23:35, 22 May 2004 (UTC)