This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Phatom87 (talk | contribs) at 00:32, 11 September 2010 (→Requested move). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:32, 11 September 2010 by Phatom87 (talk | contribs) (→Requested move)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
Torrini
white rabbit is also the name of an emilianna torrini song —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.49.219 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
To Marcus22
I don't appreciate your "Undid revision 173000971 by Weasel5i2 (talk)never heard of them - out it goes" edit of this article. I believe that it goes against everything Misplaced Pages is about, which is the sharing of knowledge by MULTIPLE individuals.
Obviously, by your Undo action, you consider YOUR knowledge to be the de facto standard for everyone else's knowledge. Did it ever even occur to you to check Google and verify the existence of the fact which I placed in the article? Apparently not.
Incidentally, I've never heard of the indie rock band, "White Rabbits" from NYC. That doesn't mean I even remotely consider myself as having the authority to remove it from the article! You need to think twice before doing things. I'm afraid to look at your contribs because I might find all sorts of other innocent bits of info which you indiscriminately removed because you "haven't heard of them"!
For starters, try this on for size. Note the first result returned: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22airplane+crashers%22
Weasel5i2 (talk) 09:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh grow up. Marcus22 (talk) 12:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, nice reply. That's all you have to say, prior to REMOVING MY EDIT AGAIN?Really mature. I stated facts and that's all you can say? Go ahead and keep removing my edit, I will keep putting it back. I am also now looking for the proper channels to file a complaint with Misplaced Pages against you.
Weasel5i2 (talk) 16:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- I didnt reply because - for no reason whatsoever - you were rude, unpleasant and uncivil. I wont reply again either unless you change your tone. But note that your "edit" is an attempt to insert a track by a band with only 480 unique G Hits. In other words, as far as I can tell, it's not worth being in Misplaced Pages. End of. Marcus22 (talk) 17:17, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I apologize for the rude tone, it is because I felt that your first edit comment and reasoning was a bit snide and pointed at me for putting them there in the first place.
Also, I realized it's not right for me to complain against you, as you are doing what you believe to be right and I don't disagree with that. However, I did submit this to the WP:Third opinion process, so hopefully we can have another person's neutral view on this issue. I realize that you may consider them non-notable, but by keeping their mention out of Misplaced Pages you are depriving others from knowing about them altogether. I added them in the first place because there was absolutely no mention of them.
In the immortal words of so many others before me, "Who/What does it hurt by keeping this entry in Misplaced Pages?" I mean, it's obviously not frivolous or untrue information; I'm not affiliated with this group in any way (and as far as I know, they don't even exist/perform anymore!) and I also believed that by adding a (not-yet-existent) wikilink to the band's name, it would have inspired someone to eventually come along and create the article!
Weasel5i2 (talk) 17:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well that's better. Thankyou for the apology. I accept it. "Who/What does it hurt by keeping this entry in Misplaced Pages?" is a fine argument and I would, personally, choose to list EVERYTHING in Misplaced Pages - but too often I have argued exactly as you only to be voted down. At the moment, this entry really isnt sufficiently notable to be in Misplaced Pages. But what the hell, after all it's not a whole article and if it matters to you - as you have taken the time to be civil - please DO put it back! regards Marcus22 (talk) 17:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I will do even better.. ^_^ This incident has inspired me to collect as much information as possible to validate their inclusion in Misplaced Pages. It seems that the "Airplane Crashers" was just one incarnation of a trio of individuals who released many songs during the "New Beat" movement of the 80s.. If I can paraphrase the information from here http://www.discogs.com/artist/Morton+Sherman+Bellucci and find more facts, I think I may have the ingredients for a good addition to the New Beat article, or perhaps even a new article unto itself for the Morton/Sherman/Bellucci trio! Weasel5i2 (talk) 17:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I looked in here to see how the dispute was going and saw that it has resolved: well done, you two. I have removed it from the Third opinion listings. — Athaenara ✉ 07:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
 | It has been proposed in this section that White Rabbit (disambiguation) be renamed and moved to White rabbit (disambiguation). A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move |
White rabbit → White rabbit (disambiguation) — White rabbit is White Rabbit from Lewis Carroll. 75.142.152.104 (talk) 22:37, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support: I am inclined to agree here. The redirect page at White rabbit (disambiguation) would need to be removed first. So I can't do this myself. Phatom87 00:32, 11 September 2010 (UTC)