This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Cunctator (talk | contribs) at 17:16, 15 June 2004 (Active.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:16, 15 June 2004 by The Cunctator (talk | contribs) (Active.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The arbitration committee exists to impose binding solutions to Misplaced Pages disputes. This solution may be anything up to and including a ban from editing the entire Misplaced Pages for a period of time.
The arbitration committee is the last step in the dispute resolution process - it is a last resort to be turned to when all else has failed. Other steps, including discussion between users and, where appropriate, mediation, should be tried first. The arbitration committee exists to deal with only the most serious disputes and cases of rule-breaking.
Until the beginning of 2004, Jimbo Wales dealt with serious disputes and was the only person with the authority to ban users who were not engaging in simple vandalism (straightforward vandals can be blocked by any administrator). In the last couple of months, this role has begun to be passed to the arbitration committee. Jimbo wrote:
- "The arbitration committee can impose a solution that I'll consider to be binding, with of course the exception that I reserve the right of executive clemency and indeed even to dissolve the whole thing if it turns out to be a disaster. But I regard that as unlikely, and I plan to do it about as often as the Queen of England dissolves Parliament against their wishes, i.e. basically never, but it is one last safety valve for our values."
- To request arbitration, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration.
- The arbitration policy details the rules involved.
Members
NOTE: The number of active AC members affects the number of AC members needed to reach a ruling. For example, if 7 AC members are active, then 4 votes are needed to reach a majority decision. If 10 are active, then 6 votes are needed, etc.
AC status: Active as of 15 June 2004
- Daniel Mayer, aka Maveric149 -- maveric149 at yahoo.com
- Fred Bauder -- fredbaud at ctelco.net
- James Forrester, aka Jdforrester -- james at jdforrester.org
- Lee Pilich, aka Camembert -- lee at audiblerecords.com
- Martin Harper, aka MyRedDice -- wikipedia at myreddice.co.uk
- Mark, aka Delirium -- delirium at rufus.d2g.com
- Sean Barrett, aka The Epopt -- sean at epoptic.org
- The Cunctator -- cunctator at kband.com
AC status: Away as of 12 June 2004
- Gutza -- gutza at moongate.ro, but please see my notice on a temporary internet outage
AC status: Inactive as of 15 June 2004
- David Friedland, aka Nohat -- david at nohat.net
AC status: Active (has participated in an AC case in the last month), Inactive (has not participated in an AC case in the last month), Away (on a temporary leave of absence)
All volunteered apart from The Cunctator, who was "drafted". Jimbo plans that future arbitrators will be elected. By choice, we don't have a chair.
External link
- Defunct Arbitration message board (active 21 Jan to 17 Mar 2004)