This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SusanLesch (talk | contribs) at 07:56, 5 December 2011 (marking done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:56, 5 December 2011 by SusanLesch (talk | contribs) (marking done)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- Science: Could a sentence or two explaining how these ideas differ from the traditional scientific view be added along with what the response of the scientific community to these ideas has been?
The movements & ideologies section may need reorganization in order to make it clearer and less complex for readers.
Done- The "Relationship to political movements" section needs a clear introductory sentence.
- Lead: mention feminism's effects on society, since that is a major part of the article.
Partly done - Theoretical schools: The second paragraph seems be entirely about literary theory. You need to place this paragraph in the context of feminist theory in general, showing us why a discussion of literary theory is appropriate here. Partly done
- The "Late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries" section seems US-centric. What is going on in the rest of the world right now? Partly done
Similarly, the article has a picture some Parisian suffragettes, but France is not even mentioned in the article body. DoneLiterature section - the second two paragraphs may be overly specific, giving the names of a few important feminist texts instead of describing the general development of feminist literature as a whole. The entire period from 1818 until the 1960s is skipped over. Undue weight may be given to feminist science fiction. Done
Please see Talk:Feminism/GA1