Misplaced Pages

User talk:Fæ

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 04:10, 17 January 2012 (Dating comment by Jrf - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:10, 17 January 2012 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Dating comment by Jrf - "")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Click to start a new talk topic
Please do not remove trolling or vandalism from this page without emailing me for confirmation first.

If you wish to contact me about any Wikimedia UK chapter matters, please email me using this email form, rather than leaving a message on my user page or on a Misplaced Pages noticeboard. Any email indicated as confidential will be limited to discussion with board members and full time staff in line with Charity Commission requirements.


Archives
2010
2011
2012


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Disclaimer

Any opinions expressed on Misplaced Pages, sister projects or in tweets and blog posts are mine and do not represent the opinion of Wikimedia UK or any other organization that I am affiliated with. – Fæ

Ho Yan Hor Herbal Tea

An article you made serious cuts to some time ago has been restored to its unsourced/non-neutral version. I was going to clean it up to remove some of the non-neutrality and lack of sourcing, but I thought you might wish to intervene first. Your edits are here, and the restoration of the old content is here. —Zach425 /contribs 20:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

I thought about rolling back, but I'm not sure it's that simple. The article has a real problem being single-sourced, however, I think this can be resolved by improvement rather than just cutting it back to a stub as I suspect reasonable mention in sources (esp. non-English) can be uncovered. I agree that the non-neutral text needs to be trimmed. Bit busy, so I'll probably not get around to looking further. Cheers -- (talk) 06:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Fæ, I'm still hoping to get your feedback on the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) article -- see question in talk page. If you agree that the citations have been improved, we'd like to remove the notability flag that you attached. Perhaps of interest to you and other Wikipedians is the new session in TREC about algorithms for recommending edits to Misplaced Pages jrf (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC).