This is an old revision of this page, as edited by West Eddy (talk | contribs) at 20:38, 6 May 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:38, 6 May 2012 by West Eddy (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Formal block notice
As promised, you are now temporarily blocked for your continued ownership of that article. You are not free to exclusively WP:OWN that article and edit warring over {{inuse}} or {{Underconstruction}} to gain unilateral control of the article is not acceptable. Toddst1 (talk) 21:33, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Nonsense
I changed the tag on Html for a button to Test Page. Nonsense is for things like 'trxytrvujyiob oino jvuyvuy' (but make sure it's not in some form of Foreign - even though it mau look unpronounceable, drop a couple of 'words' into Google first). It's also for things like 'bear pole infraction scarlet hypericum floozy' that would not pass muster even at a Surreal Poetry club. If it makes some sort of sense, it's not our nonsense cat. It's actually quite rare as a CSD find. Test page covers quite a few things, but I think this was a genuine test. Peridon (talk) 11:28, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
May 2012
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 20:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report about Anon360 (talk · contribs · block log) on Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Misplaced Pages and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 20:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
West Eddy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have attempted to discuss the dispute at hand with another editor on the talk page, and suggested to him/her that dispute resolution could be a good idea. I realize that I should have simply sought out the resolution rather than continuing to edit. I haven't been involved with an editing war before, but I realize I didn't handle this properly. I won't object to this page being protected so this can be sorted out. In the mean time, I would appreciate if this block could be removed so that I can return to editing other pages. West Eddy (talk) 20:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have attempted to discuss the dispute at hand with another editor on the talk page, and suggested to him/her that dispute resolution could be a good idea. I realize that I should have simply sought out the resolution rather than continuing to edit. I haven't been involved with an editing war before, but I realize I didn't handle this properly. I won't object to this page being protected so this can be sorted out. In the mean time, I would appreciate if this block could be removed so that I can return to editing other pages. ] (]) 20:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have attempted to discuss the dispute at hand with another editor on the talk page, and suggested to him/her that dispute resolution could be a good idea. I realize that I should have simply sought out the resolution rather than continuing to edit. I haven't been involved with an editing war before, but I realize I didn't handle this properly. I won't object to this page being protected so this can be sorted out. In the mean time, I would appreciate if this block could be removed so that I can return to editing other pages. ] (]) 20:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have attempted to discuss the dispute at hand with another editor on the talk page, and suggested to him/her that dispute resolution could be a good idea. I realize that I should have simply sought out the resolution rather than continuing to edit. I haven't been involved with an editing war before, but I realize I didn't handle this properly. I won't object to this page being protected so this can be sorted out. In the mean time, I would appreciate if this block could be removed so that I can return to editing other pages. ] (]) 20:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}