Misplaced Pages

User talk:Earl King Jr.

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bbb23 (talk | contribs) at 01:14, 8 June 2012 (Refactoring: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:14, 8 June 2012 by Bbb23 (talk | contribs) (Refactoring: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hello Earl King Jr. (talk) 04:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes, and please go to what ever page is being discussed and we can hold the conversation there. Earl King Jr. (talk) 17:09, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Resource-based economy". Thank you. --IjonTichyIjonTichy (talk) 05:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your work

I'm sorry about the misunderstanding(s) we had. I apologize. Thank you for your good work on Resource-based economy. I'm looking forward to continuing to cooperate with you on improving future articles. Regards and best wishes, IjonTichyIjonTichy (talk) 17:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. IjonTichyIjonTichy (talk) 01:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Refactoring

Do not refactor other editors' comments as you did at Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement. First, you removed more than just one editor's comment. You removed the comment that opened the topic. Second, although some of the comments by IjonTichyIjonTichy may have been more about the subject than about the article, it was a blend as much of it was about the article itself. Thus, your justification fails.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC)