This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Water marble nail (talk | contribs) at 10:59, 16 June 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:59, 16 June 2012 by Water marble nail (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Mathsci
Mathsci (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci/Archive.
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
16 June 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Peter E. James (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Clear sock- or meat-puppetry at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Matilda. The discussion turns on an email sent to Mathsci two years ago, which he then commented on at User talk:Rhomb in April 2010. PEJ turns up at the SPI with a detailed textual analysis of this private email to support Mathsci's position (that he had been mistaken in what he wrote then about that email). Quite clearly no-one but Mathsci himself, or a close friend contacted off-wiki could know that, and it's a pretty clear case of trying to stack the discussion by promoting a false appearance of agreement for Mathsci's position. Checkuser suggested to determine whether this is Mathsci himself or just a friend. Water marble nail (talk) 10:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: