This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nickaang (talk | contribs) at 14:41, 22 January 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:41, 22 January 2013 by Nickaang (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Paul Ranni (entertainer)
- Paul Ranni (entertainer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not significant or noteworthy enough to have a Misplaced Pages page Todd Friedman (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: the nominator is a SPA who appears to be here only to disparage the reputation of the subject of that article. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- That would perhaps be true if the subject had a reputation to be disparaged. Please consider whether or not this man is actually significant enough to be included on Misplaced Pages, because if the answer is yes, the amount of quasi-internet famous people worthy of their own page would skyrocket. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.179.159.84 (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Regardless of the nominator's actions, I am unable to find any independent reviews, interviews, or published commentary on the article subject. The refs in the article go to self-published sources and/or promotional PR pieces. Subject apparently isn't notable yet. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 02:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Thanks, Jeff G. for pointing us and I agree with Uncle Milty. No significance now maybe later. Many thanks, NickAang (talk) 14:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC)