User talk:IronKnuckle - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Drmies (talk | contribs) at 18:50, 22 January 2013 (→Chameleon: zing!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:50, 22 January 2013 by Drmies (talk | contribs) (→Chameleon: zing!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC) Welcome!

Hello, IronKnuckle, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Misplaced Pages's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Well I admit I'm not feeling very welcome right now, and my point of view is neutral. IronKnuckle (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

If you take any criticism of your purely destructive 'contributions' here as a personal attack, you will feel that way. But you are plainly not neutral, and I frankly don't care if you can't tell reasoned criticism from a personal attack. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

They arent purely destructive, and for you to say so without evidence is quite foolish. IronKnuckle (talk) 16:04, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Fine. I've looked at your contributions listing. I can't find this non-destructive evidence you claim exists. Can you provide me with even a single diff, dated earlier than the time of this comment, where you edit a page in the main article space, other than to include or amend an AfD? AlexTiefling (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I request you leave my page and stop editing on it. I request no more contact from you. IronKnuckle (talk) 16:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

You're free to delete my comments. I'll certainly be taking yours off my Talk page shortly. But you told me that there was no evidence that your contributions had been solely destructive. That looked like asking me to prove a negative, so I just asked you for a single confirming instance of your own claim. I'm not surprised you tried driving me away instead, but as you began this conversation, you should recognise the consequences of doing so. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I requested no futher contact from you, yet you persist, I feel you are harassing me now. IronKnuckle (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Chameleon

Hello, Chameleon (film) has been overhauled. Can you please review the current revision as well as the comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Chameleon (film)? Thanks, Erik (talk | contribs) 16:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Yea I'm a bit tied up right now, being harassed by gun control supporters who dont like my AfD's. IronKnuckle (talk) 16:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Im about as far from a gun control supporter as you can get (I own an evil assault AR15!) but a decent number of your AFDs were meritless. Just beacuse we agree that certain people are idiots, does not mean that they aren't notable idiots. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Get rid of it, Gaijin. ExtenZe works just as well. Drmies (talk) 18:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Oy vay...

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IronKnuckle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why was I blocked for being a sockpuppet? A sock puppet of who? There is no proof of this, and the CheckUser said I was unrelated. I dont understand why I would be blocked for this. I have done nothing wrong. It it's already been proven I'm not a sock...

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as mooted - Sockpuppetry was stricken as a block rationale. Please re-request unblocking in a manner that addresses the revised block rationale posted below. UltraExactZZ ~ Did 17:32, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No comment on the merits, but the checkuser result only says that your account is

Unrelated to a specific other account - not that you have not (or are not) socking. Checkuser searches are narrowly tailored to the question at hand - in this case, are you and Maydewsl the same editor? It did not check your account against all other accounts. UltraExactZZ ~ Did 17:31, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Abuse of multiple accounts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for ~~abusing another account to influence the outcome of a deletion discussion (please see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/IronKnuckle), and for~~ a general lack of competence regarding the interpretation of Misplaced Pages's guidelines on notability and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk) 17:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Since checkuser has now proven that your account is not related to Maydewsl, I have struck that part from my reasoning for your block. However, your inability to interpret the notability guidelines and your false accusations of personal attacks have turned out to be disruptive, so I will keep the block. Please confirm another administrator that you have actually understood how Misplaced Pages works to be unblocked. De728631 (talk) 17:27, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- As long as you keep saying that your AfDs are opposed because the people opposing them are gun control advocates you will get nowhere. Not everything is political, and we try to run a clean shop. Drmies (talk) 18:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)