This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JzG (talk | contribs) at 22:11, 16 May 2006 (→[]: Comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:11, 16 May 2006 by JzG (talk | contribs) (→[]: Comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Bi-Digital O-Ring Test
Completely absurd article. Somewhat high in ghits, but I propose that it is still non-notable. A variety of ghits are on absurd patent sites. No real verifiable sources, mostly questionable papers, and some suspect sources - why is the clinic on the website of some random ISP instead of the hospital website. Also, searching on google for the award mentioned gives only two hits, one of which is to the baobab site. Philosophus 20:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- After looking at early revisions of this article, I have decided to remain neutral on this, as it seems to be more notable than I had thought. --Philosophus 21:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment utterly bizarre! Just goes to show that there's still one born every minute.. Looks like a cautious keep right now, but more research needed. Anybody with knowledge of this area? Just zis Guy you know? 22:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)