Misplaced Pages

User talk:GiantSnowman

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GiantSnowman (talk | contribs) at 16:30, 20 February 2013 (heading). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:30, 20 February 2013 by GiantSnowman (talk | contribs) (heading)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archives

2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013


User:SuzanneOlsson

Hello GiantSnowman. Since you closed the debate on an editing restriction, do you want to enter the result in WP:RESTRICT? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that takes care of it, thank you. EdJohnston (talk) 16:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
I have now explained to her what "broadly construed" means since she was apparently thinking she only got banned from editing the main article Roza Bal. De728631 (talk) 19:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, sadly. Could you please explain to her whether continuing Talk page edits are allowed. Personally I have no objection, but the close appears to include Talk pages? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013

Hi! What I've added in IFFHS is not my personal analysis but a translation of the german-language source I've already used as a reference in the article. Isksin (talk) 17:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Those aren't muskets/Micheal swaim?

I saw you recently deleted the Those Aren't Muskets page and i believe Micheal Swaim's page for being "not notable" and was wondering if there's any way of getting them back up? Just seeing if there's a chance, Thanks! Mango57 (talk) 00:17, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Mango57

Strongvibration

thanks for your concern , best regard, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strongvibration (talkcontribs) 16:22, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Great Zimbabwe - again !

Giant Snowman - Many thanks for offering to help (18:51, 17 February). Please take another look at the recent history of "Great Zimbabwe". User "Waslalh" did at least come on to the Talk-Page (although he did not really seem to grasp the essential point - i.e., that people doexist who support the Lemba Theory). However, as you will see, User ‎86.60.65.22 has recently reverted sourced text twice within the space of just a few minutes. Is it possible to 'Lock' the "Great Zimbabwe" file, please, at least for a while? ... DougWeller and I did agree on a compromise text at 16:25 on 17 Feb.... Gratefully, --DLMcN (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC)