This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Timotheus Canens (talk | contribs) at 07:11, 5 March 2013 (→User:Kevin's unblock of User:Cla68: alphabetize). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:11, 5 March 2013 by Timotheus Canens (talk | contribs) (→User:Kevin's unblock of User:Cla68: alphabetize)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
ArbitrationCommittee
| Misplaced Pages Arbitration |
|---|
 |
| Open proceedings |
| Active sanctions |
| Arbitration Committee |
Audit
|
| Track related changes |
This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.
Announcement archives:- 0 (2008-12 – 2009-01)
- 1 (to 2009-02)
- 2 (to 2009-05)
- 3 (to 2009-06)
- 4 (to 2009-07)
- 5 (to 2009-12)
- 6 (to 2010-12)
- 7 (to 2011-12)
- 8 (to 2012-12)
- 9 (to 2013-12)
- 10 (to 2015-12)
- 11 (to 2018-04)
- 12 (to 2020-08)
- 13 (to 2023-03)
- 14 (to present)
Arbitration motion under consideration regarding withdrawn case requests
The Arbitration Committee is currently considering a motion on withdrawn arbitration case requests. The community may comment on the proposed motion in the community comments section.
For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm 21:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding withdrawn case requests
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
If the filing party of a request for an arbitration case withdraws said request, the request may be removed after 24 hours if:
- No arbitrator has voted to accept the case; or
- There are four net votes to decline the case.
In all other circumstances, the request shall remain open until 24 hours after the above circumstances apply, or until the case can be accepted or declined through the procedures outlined in "Opening of proceedings".
For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Declaration of possible conflict of interest
I have just accepted a contractual position with the Wikimedia Foundation, and posted a full disclosure with details and an invitation for community comments here. — Coren 21:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Motions with respect to functionaries
In early January 2013, the Arbitration Committee reviewed several aspects of the appointment and review processes related to Checkusers, Oversighters and AUSC members, including the appointment extension of advanced permissions to former arbitrators. In preparation for this review, arbitrators retiring as of 31 December 2012 were permitted to retain Checkuser and Oversight permissions at their request on an interim basis until the completion of the review and decisions on next steps. The motions that the Arbitration Committee will vote on are located at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Motions; other motions may be proposed as well. All functionaries and community members are invited to participate in the discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Risker (talk • contribs) 02:07, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
User:Kevin's unblock of User:Cla68
Kevin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) has unilaterally reversed a block placed by two oversighters relating to the repeated posting of personal information. Kevin failed to obtain agreement for the unblocking from either the oversighters or the Arbitration Committee prior to doing so. Accordingly, Kevin is temporarily desysopped in accordance with Level II procedures for removing administrative tools. The unblock of Cla68 (talk · contribs) is to be reversed until Cla68's appeal is addressed by the Arbitration Committee.
- Support: Carcharoth, Coren, Courcelles, David Fuchs, Hersfold, SilkTork, Timotheus Canens
- Oppose: Newyorkbrad
- Recused: Kirill Lokshin, NuclearWarfare
- Not voting: AGK, Risker, Roger Davies, Worm That Turned
- Inactive: Salvio giuliano
For the Arbitration Committee, T. Canens (talk) 06:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Arbitration motion under consideration regarding Oversight-related blocks
The Arbitration Committee is currently considering a motion on Oversight-related blocks. The community may comment on the proposed motion in the general discussion section.
For the Arbitration Committee, --Guerillero | My Talk 07:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Categories: