This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Iselilja (talk | contribs) at 20:40, 9 March 2013 (Undid revision 543077541 by HistoryofIran (talk) Restoring decline reason.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:40, 9 March 2013 by Iselilja (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 543077541 by HistoryofIran (talk) Restoring decline reason.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)March 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Surena. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
HistoryofIran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why the hell i am blocked? what have i done? i have only added sources and improved a wikipedia page with a picture and many more things? maybe you should read the Surena page.. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
For my reasoning, see my post below that you have already deleted. See also the full 3RR report: Misplaced Pages:AN3#User:HistoryofIran reported by Fut.Perf. (Result: Blocked for 72 hours). The 3RR report included a diff from a different article in which you changed a word that was included in several direct quotes, thus falsifying the references. I guess that you don't care about references, since you already know that you are correct about everything. Perhaps you should be working on your own personal web site instead of Misplaced Pages. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
:)