Misplaced Pages

Criticism of the Latter Day Saint movement

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DavidBailey (talk | contribs) at 22:40, 22 May 2006 (rv AJA, your edits remove useful information and are hardly NPOV. Please avoid being contentious. See Misplaced Pages:Civility.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:40, 22 May 2006 by DavidBailey (talk | contribs) (rv AJA, your edits remove useful information and are hardly NPOV. Please avoid being contentious. See Misplaced Pages:Civility.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Life-size figure of Joseph Smith

Criticism of Mormonism is criticism of the Latter Day Saint movement, especially of the largest and most prominent sect, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (hereafter referred to as the LDS Church).

As defined here, criticism is an all-encompassing term referring to critical scrutiny of, or disagreement with, Mormon beliefs or practices, with reasons ranging from academic interest, to religious motivations, to outright prejudice.

Theological critiques of Mormonism come out of concern for orthodoxy, whereas scientists and scholars may question the historicity of the Book of Mormon. The term anti-Mormon, which is often misused, refers to those whose criticism is motivated chiefly by a desire to antagonise.

Doctrinal criticism

Christian theologians who address the topic usually teach that Mormonism is a form of pseudo-Christianity, which has departed from the teachings given in the Bible and now espouses beliefs fundamentally different. Mormonism is sometimes called a cult. At other times it is compared with ancient gnosticism or Arianism.

The nature of divinity

Lorenzo Snow

Mormons are nontrinitarian and believe that God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are three separate beings, which form one Godhead. In addition, they believe that both the Father and the Son have physical bodies. By contrast, Trinitarian theology teaches that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one substance or essence and that the Father does not have a physical body.

Although not "doctrinal" and not found in Mormon scripture, many Mormons postulate other concepts or principles. First, is the concept of eternal progression. Fundamentally, they believe in a form of theosis whereby humankind, as children of God, can become like him in every way. To further clarify, they believe they are co-inheritors with Christ to inherit all that the Father has.(See Romans 8:17.) The concept of eternal progression is further expanded to apply to God that is summarized in a couplet by Lorenzo Snow: "As man now is, God once was: As God now is, man may become." Joseph Smith taught a similar concept in a funeral talk known as the King Follett Discourse. Second, LDS believe in a concept of Exaltation, where a man and a woman may be sealed on earth and thus will be sealed for all time and eternity.

The concept of eternal progression applied to God is seen to contradict the Bible often citing Isaiah 43:10, in which God declares: "before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me." They have also been criticized on logical grounds.

Orthodox defense of the Trinity against Mormonism focuses on the doctrine of Divine unity, citing passages such as the Shema Yisrael.

Orthodox Christianity does not have a concept of men and women being married in heaven, but exactly the opposite. Orthodoxy finds support in the Bible: "For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heavn>"Matthew 22:30.

Belief in exaltation has been defended by reference to passages such as 2 Peter 1:4, as well as many statements by early Christians about humans being divinized (a doctrine known to the Eastern Orthodox as theosis). Christian apologists reply that there is only superficial similarity, noting the crucial distinction made between the Divine energies which creatures may participate in, and the Divine essence, which is uncreated and therefore entirely different from whatever is created.

Salvation

Another frequent topic of criticism, especially among evangelicals, is the basis of salvation, which Mormons hold to be both grace and works

Many Christians reject anything like this thinking. For example, in an article not specifically directed against Mormonism, John F. MacArthur said:

There are many who make justification dependent on a mixture of faith and works... This was the error of the Galatian legalists (cf. Galatians 2:16 5:4). Paul called it "a different gospel" (Galatians 1:6, 1:9). The same error is found in virtually every false cult.

Authority

Joseph Smith claimed that the priesthood, which he defined as authority to act in God's name, had been removed because of apostasy, which Mormons believe to have been prophecied in the Bible (see Great Apostasy). Most Christians believe a complete apostasy is impossible. Catholic apologist Patrick Madrid wrote:

Since Christ is the mind and head of his Church (Ephesians 4:15-16), animating the body, the members enjoy an organic spiritual union with him (John 15:1-8). It's inconceivable that he would permit his body to disintegrate under the attacks of Satan.

Catholics often see the Mormon priesthood as a counterfeit of their own Apostolic Succession. Protestants, on the other hand, often believe in the priesthood of all believers.

Mainstream Christians believe that the Canon of Scripture is closed, making the Bible the only sacred text for Christians. Many Protestants also consider it the only infallible authority, a doctrine called Sola scriptura. Latter-day Saints believe that The Book of Mormon, The Pearl of Great Price and the Doctrine and Covenants are also the word of God.

Criticism of the Book of Mormon

Many attempted refutations of Mormonism begin with an examination of the Book of Mormon, which is an integral part of LDS scripture. Thus far, scientific and scholarly studies have failed to substantiate much of the book, and in some cases, seem to contradict its claims.

DNA

The Book of Mormon has come under criticism because of its claim that Native Americans are descended from Hebrew settlers who arrived about 600 BC. Mormons often call Native Americans 'Lamanites' after one of these settlers who became the leader of one group. According to the Book of Mormon, some of the first inhabitants of America were a race called the Jaredites. Mormon scholars have theorized for more than 100 years as to how much Jaredite blood Native Americans have versus Hebrew blood.

Archaeology

File:Espada bastarda.jpeg
A sword

The Book of Mormon appears to describe an Old World material culture which archaeological evidence suggests was entirely absent from pre-Columbian America. Mormon apologists often argue that the words referring to Old World objects such as swords and chariots are simply convenient translations into English of words that originally referred to technology used in the Americas.


James White addressed the argument that references to swords might mean macuahuitls by quoting 1 Nephi 4:9, which is a detailed description of the Sword of Laban in terms appropriate to the verse's Old World context, and then 2 Nephi 5:14-15, in which that sword in the pattern for the Nephites' weapons in the New World, which White considers a contradiction of the archaeological record.

Literary Criticism

Mark Twain gave the Book of Mormon a negative review, calling it "chloroform in print" and a "tedious plagiarism". He made special mention of the excessive use of the phrase "it came to pass", ascribing this to an over-zealous attempt at sounding biblical.

Jerald and Sandra Tanner believe they have discovered several indications in the text of modern rather than ancient authorship. Some themes are, in their view, directly addressed to issues which were controversial around the time it was written or translated, such as infant baptism, whether church names should include the name of Christ, a paid ministry, secret societies, the origin of the Native Americans.

Critics of Mormonism

There are several organizations which oppose the Mormon church. Their activities vary. In most cases the primary activity is informational – they seek to provide what they regard as a true picture of the Mormon church. Some are independent while others are connected with parent churches, and not all are Christian. Examples of such organizations are:Utah Lighthouse Ministry (founded by Jerald and Sandra Tanner), Mormon Research Ministries, Mormons in Transition, Utah Partnerships for Christ, and The Exmormon Foundation.

Some anti-Mormons have become well-known for their activities. A few of them are:

A large portion of Utah residents are often described as Anti-Mormon due to political opposition of many popular conservative political agendas. This is vastly different from the Anti-Mormon beliefs of some fundamentalist and evangelical Christians who oppose Mormon Theology. Many Utah media outlets such as The Salt Lake Tribune, Salt Lake City Weekly, and the University of Utah's Daily Utah Chronicle are often described as "Anti-Mormon" even though many of the contributors are Mormon themselves. Many of these charges surfaced when Mark Hofmann sold forged documents to the LDS Church and when Salt Lake City sold one block of Main Street to the church, with what many felt was too little public input.

In the case of the Salt Lake Tribune, however, this reputation stems from the paper being founded as an openly anti-Mormon publication in the 1800's. Over the years since, this position has moderated significantly, to the point of near-neutrality. The other major newspaper in Utah is the Deseret Morning News, founded by the Church. The two papers routinely cooperate in a number of areas, including sharing advertising and distribution channels.

References

  1. "Lorenzo Snow, About Mormons". Retrieved 2006-05-08.
  2. "A logical proof that Mormonism is false". Retrieved 2006-05-08.
  3. "God: POLYTHEISM". Retrieved 2006-05-08.
  4. ""I Have Said, 'Ye are Gods'": Concepts Conducive to the Early Christian Doctrine of Deification in Patristic Literature and the Underlying Strata of the Greek New Testament Text". Retrieved 2006-05-08.
  5. See "Mormonism 201: Chapter 3 The Trinity". Retrieved 2006-05-08. and "Did The Early Church Believe In the LDS Doctrine of God?". Retrieved 2006-05-08.
  6. "Jesus' Perspective on Sola Fide". Retrieved 2006-05-08.
  7. Nephi's Neighbors
  8. "Of Cities and Swords". Retrieved 2006-05-09.
  9. "Roughing It, Chapter XVI". Retrieved 2006-05-09.
  10. Tanner, Jerald and Sandra. Mormonism -- Shadow or Reality?, fifth edition. Utah Lighthouse Ministry, 1987.

External links

Pro-LDS or LDS Apologetic Websites

Critical or Anti-Mormon Websites

Categories: