This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pigsonthewing (talk | contribs) at 12:39, 22 March 2013 (An "uppity" project?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:39, 22 March 2013 by Pigsonthewing (talk | contribs) (An "uppity" project?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
← Back to WikiProject report
Discuss this story
The RfC linked to above, called for by members of WikiProject Composers, concluded that:
WikiProjects are free to publish guidelines and recommendations but do not have the authority to override a local consensus on the talk page of an article.
Infoboxes are not to be added nor removed systematically from articles. Such actions would be considered disruptive.
Yet members of the project, including some interviewed above, persist in removing infoboxes from articles about composers on sight, and without debate, giving WP:COMPOSERS as a justification. We thus have a small number of editors, operating as a team, to override wider community consensus. Their response to this being pointed out often comprises ad hominem attacks; and article talk page debates are often the subject of their partisan canvassing. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:39, 22 March 2013 (UTC)