Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yogesh Khandke (talk | contribs) at 15:34, 28 March 2013 (→March 2013: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Need time for the real world.

workshop

testing talk page communication Pradip Pawar (talk) 11:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

OK! Yogesh Khandke (talk) 11:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi!

On 26 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the articles Brahmachari (1938 film) and Meenakshi Shirodkar.

The fact was ... that Meenakshi Shirodkar stunned the traditional audience when she appeared in a swimsuit in the 1938 Marathi film Brahmachari?

Thanks for giving this idea to us. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:11, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

No mention please! Yogesh Khandke (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Ost (talk) 15:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

You have message

Hello. You have a new message at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Prasad Shrikant Purohit's talk page. —— Mr T 12:53, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

I meant you should check out what Mar4d wrote to you on that page. Also sorry that I didn't include a sign before here. Mr T 08:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

We must differentiate between a suspect/ an accused and a convict. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 08:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

In this argument, I am on your side. But I think your contentions are worth more in that discussion page. Did you see Mar4d's response? If you don't agree then I encourage you to put a terse comment there. Cheers, Mr T 07:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry too late. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 04:31, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lisa Sthalekar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marathi

Shreevatsa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marathi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

For your contributions at the page of Lok Biradari Prakalp. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 12:27, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Oh thanks! So thoughtful of you to have made it black for me a vegan. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 14:02, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Stich

Hi Yogesh - it is unsourced, but I think it's also unnecessary unless it's an actual quote. The article already says basically the same thing here: " lost his business, money, home, and ultimately his liberty". Pburka (talk) 23:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

As I wrote on your page, making unsourced edits is against my grain, so this one surprises me. You are right, we have the statement you have quoted above, so it is quite unnecessary to have one very similar a few lines down the article. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello

Hi YK, how are you. You don't seem to be very active these days.--sarvajna (talk) 07:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

True, hands are full. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 07:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nick Vujicic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evangelist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Kokani Muslims

Hello,

I was looking up the Kokani Muslims page and see that you have heavily edited the page. Can you please inform me as to why? As I thought it was quite informative in its previous incarnation. I am not sure that the information that you have put, name that Kokni's are mainly Maliki, from my knowledge I have known Kokni's to be predominantly Shafi.

Kind regards

E Husain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehusain (talk • contribs) 20:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Misplaced Pages about living persons, as you did to Teesta Setalvad‎. Thank you. We cannot call her Communist unless we can quote her saying she is. I also removed her being implicated as that is also a BLP violation unless there are convictions. Dougweller (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

I merely summarised: "Teesta and her husband Javed Anand are both committed communists who describe themselves as "very proud of being part of the Left tradition." Also I don't understand the necessity of the formal "March 2013" sub-section title. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 17:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

How is that even a violation, they say that they are proud of being part of left tradition, this is an opinion piece written by Teesta and her husband and in the end they write we are both very proud of being part of the Left tradition--sarvajna (talk) 05:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

And we could use that as a quote perhaps. But WP:BLP is pretty clear, contentious material needs very good sources. See WP:BLPREMOVE. Does she say she is a Communist? A huge number of people identify as part of the left tradition but are not communists. Apologies that this was done formally, I was tired and took a shortcut. Dougweller (talk) 09:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Dougweller you missed answering the key question: I merely summed material in the main section and put it in the lead, why is material in the main section kosher for you and bad as soon as it is placed in the lead? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 15:21, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

One more question from my end as well which you did not answer on the article's talk page, you used a blog as a RS to defend removal. Why was that? --sarvajna (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Sarvajna he needs to answer that on the article talk page. I have stopped warring on article pages, so I won't revert Dougweller. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 15:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)