Misplaced Pages

User talk:Chick Bowen

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Almost Famous (talk | contribs) at 20:03, 22 May 2006 (you're a fucking idiot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:03, 22 May 2006 by Almost Famous (talk | contribs) (you're a fucking idiot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I will be here only intermittently for the forseeable future. If you need an administrator, please leave a message at WP:AN; if you want to appeal a block place {{unblock}} on your talk page. You may e-mail me, but note that I only check that account about once a day. Chick Bowen 01:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

To leave me a message, click here.

Roblefko

Relevant sections of the email header are as follows: 

Received: from mail.wikimedia.org (unverified ) 
   by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.2f) with ESMTP id 213770800 
   for <xxxxxx>; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:19:08 +0930 (CST)
Received: from zwinger.wikimedia.org (zwinger.wikimedia.org )
   by mail.wikimedia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6E8177E45
   for <xxxxxx>; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:49:31 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:49:02 GMT

It arrived a little under 3 hours ago as of this message Enigmatical 05:32, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Reply User_talk:Yskyflyer#Roblefko--E-Bod 20:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello Chick Bowen. No I have been fortunate enough to not have been spammed since. Thankyou for your concerns. Regards, ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 01:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Ref converter

I answered your comment here: User talk:Cyde/Ref converter. --Cyde Weys 04:17, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

butterfly deletion - fresheneesz

Hey, yea actually I redirected butterfly diagram, then realized I wanted to move butterfly (FFT algorithem) there. Thats all. Thanks Fresheneesz 04:09, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Hyphenated Hindenburg piano

I bet that line was added by either a native German speaker whose English isn't great, or by someone whose German is passably good but whose English isn't too great either. Compound words in German are very very common, and it's common for adjectives to be part of a compound word. This probably got hyphenated in the translation from "Aluminiumblütherklavier" or something similar. :) --chris.lawson 14:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

The dog AfD closure

Interesting reading of policy, but no application to WP:DRV will be forthcoming :) hehe - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 02:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Need Admin Help ASAP

User talk:67.172.202.164 has been vandalizing Moshe Teitelbaum (a major rabbi who died earlier today) repeatedly and a lot in a very evil way, making fun of the holocaust etc. etc. Urgent blocking action is needed plz. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 02:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

My martoons

I want to keep my Page On Martoons. please tell me why you tried to delete it (because I'm New). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marley Hannan (talk • contribs) .

Proposed Block

i have never made a joke page you fag dont threaten to block me indefinately or i will find out where you live —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 17681 (talk • contribs) .

Releasing Personal information on Misplaced Pages

Thanks for taking care of that edit. Could you go through all of 69.133.158.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)'s contributions though and delete them all. They posted the same information you already deleted from WP:AN. DGX 22:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

IFD

I apologize I got impatient and moved it to May 1st because I thought it was either inadvertently missed or was ignored. Thank you for deleting it. Misterrick 03:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


Copy: Talk:Soggy biscuit

An anonymous user (presumably the blocked User:MutterErde) inserts a copy of a deleted article from dewiki. Since s/he uses permalinks it may be advisable to delete the affected versions.--gwaihir 10:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

I deleted the revisions as you suggested. We should keep an eye on this, as it's been reinserted more than once. The article in question is de:Kekswichsen, which has been protected against recreation there. Getting around that by posting the same content here should not be permitted. By the way, what makes you think this is MutterErde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)? Chick Bowen 18:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Typical behaviour, AOL-proxy IP address, several places on dewiki, e.g. de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Cascari/Januar#Kekswichsen.--gwaihir 19:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Source: "http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive79"

Questions:
1.Is anything wrong with that article? (it´s in fact much (!) better than the en-version).
2.Is it forbidden to put the better German version on the talk site of its en-version?
If yes,show me the paragraph, if not shut up. Not amused. MutterErde 195.93.60.132 14:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
see also : User talk:Jimbo Wales:Quiz:How many fakers you can name? 195.93.60.132 14:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Hey boy, I´ve asked you something. See also here MutterErde 07:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC) (not amused)

Patent Nonsense

Thanks for the clarification about hoax/patent nonsense distinction . I have a further question, but I don't want to clutter the AfD discussion. I don't mean to belabor the point, but I don't see in the patent nonsense guideline anything indicating that something that is clearly a hoax can be deleted speedily. The closest thing to it seems to be criteria 2: Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever. However, if the article is clearly a hoax, but well written, it doesn't seem to qualify.

I'm certainly not complaining about these sort of articles being deleted speedily. In some cases, leaving the article be for the full prod duration makes no sense. I just want to make sure I'm doing the right thing when I tag an article (still learning the finer points). ScottW 23:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Right, that example makes sense, and I'll take a look at WP:SNOW. Thanks for your patience. ScottW 00:03, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Incorrect redirection of "Visual RTOS"

Please delete the redirection of "Visual RTOS" to "Real Time Operating System". There is nothing "Visual" or graphical about Real Time Operating Systems so it shows incorrect article. Since my article was classified by you as a product advertisement, I won't create any more of it again. But I do not want an incorrect redirection of that protected trademark (USPTO) either. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pateldi (talk • contribs) .

WP:CP

Thanks for noticing :-) I appreciate it. --lightdarkness 04:51, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


You are a Problem

your probably some freshman hs student who kissed major ass just to become an administrator and use it to fuck with other people. Almost Famous 20:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)