Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Wikipediocracy - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shirt58 (talk | contribs) at 10:43, 19 May 2013 (WP:TWINKLE has added a space before my sig. Format tidy. Link WP:CIVIL. Remove duplicated text: "may as well get this get " -> "may as well get this"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 10:43, 19 May 2013 by Shirt58 (talk | contribs) (WP:TWINKLE has added a space before my sig. Format tidy. Link WP:CIVIL. Remove duplicated text: "may as well get this get " -> "may as well get this")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Wikipediocracy

Wikipediocracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

OK, may as well get this started: it just hasn't got enough coverage yet. Fails WP:GNG, specific guideline WP:WEB. Yes, it was mentioned in a reliable source, exactly once. Is The Daily Dot a reliable source? Hmm... Wikipediocracy is of course a WP:PRIMARY source about itself. And so on. Slashdot it ain't.
In my opinion, this AfD was inevitable, and probably best if an uncontroversial wikignome (and one who is happy to admit when they are wrong) kicks off.
Keep it nice and stick to the relevant criteria for deletion, people. Shirt58 (talk) 10:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Categories: