Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rybec (talk | contribs) at 17:25, 30 July 2013 (also convicted on additional charges). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

United States v. Bradley Manning
Private First Class Bradley E. Manning
Court	United States Army Military District of Washington
Full case name	United States of America v. Manning, Bradley E., PFC
Case history
Prior actions	Article 32 hearing, opened December 16, 2011 Formally charged, February 23, 2012 Article 39 (pre-trial) hearing, opened April 24, 2012
Court membership
Judge sitting	Colonel Denise Lind

United States v. Bradley Manning is the court-martial of United States Army Private First Class Bradley E. Manning.

Manning was arrested in May 2010 in Iraq, where he had been stationed since October 2009, after Adrian Lamo, a computer hacker in the United States, told the FBI that Manning had acknowledged passing classified material to the whistleblower website, WikiLeaks. Manning was ultimately charged with 22 offenses, including communicating national defense information to an unauthorized source, and the most serious of the charges, aiding the enemy. Other charges include violations of the Espionage Act, stealing U.S. government property, charges under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and charges related to the failure to obey lawful general orders under Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. He entered guilty pleas to 10 of 22 charges in February 2013. The trial began on June 3, 2013. It went to the judge on July 26, 2013 and the verdict is scheduled to be read at 1pm on July 30. On July 30, Manning was acquitted of aiding the enemy for giving secrets to WikiLeaks. He was convicted of five counts of espionage, and other counts.

Background

The material in question includes 251,287 United States diplomatic cables, over 400,000 classified army reports from the Iraq War (the Iraq War logs), and 90,000 army reports from the war in Afghanistan (the Afghan War logs). WikiLeaks also received two videos. One was of the July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike (dubbed the "Collateral Murder" video); the second, which was never published, was of the May 2009 Granai airstrike in Afghanistan.

Manning was charged on July 5, 2010, with violations of Articles 92 and 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which were alleged to have taken place between November 19, 2009, and May 27, 2010. These were replaced on March 1, 2011, with 22 charges, including aiding the enemy, wrongfully causing intelligence to be published on the Internet knowing that it was accessible to the enemy, theft of public property or records, and transmitting defense information. Manning was found not guilty for the most serious of the charges, aiding the enemy, for which Manning could have faced life in prison..

Pre-trial hearings

Article 32 hearing

A panel of experts ruled in April 2011 that Manning was fit to stand trial. An Article 32 hearing, presided over by Lieutenant Colonel Paul Almanza, was convened on December 16, 2011, at Fort Meade, Maryland, to determine whether to proceed to a court martial. The army was represented by Captain Ashden Fein, Captain Joe Morrow, and Captain Angel Overgaard. Manning was represented by military attorneys Major Matthew Kemkes and Captain Paul Bouchard, and by civilian attorney David Coombs.

The hearing resulted in Almanza recommending that Manning be referred to a general court-martial, and on February 3, 2012, Major General Michael Linnington – commanding general of the Military District of Washington, the court-martial convening authority – ordered him to stand trial on all 22 charges, including aiding the enemy. He was formally charged (arraigned) on February 23, and declined to enter a plea.

Prosecution evidence

The lead prosecutor, Capt. Ashden Fein, argued that Manning had given enemies "unfettered access" to the material and had displayed an "absolute indifference" to classified information. He showed the court a video of Adam Gadahn, an al-Qaeda spokesman, referencing the leaked material.

The prosecution presented 300,000 pages of documents in evidence, including chat logs and classified material. Nicks writes that Manning appeared to have taken few security precautions. After his arrest, detectives searched his basement room in his aunt's house in Potomac, Maryland, and found an SD card they say contained the Afghan and Iraq War logs, along with a message to WikiLeaks. Investigators said he had also left trails on his computers of Google and Intelink searches, and of using Wget to download documents.

The court heard from two army investigators, Special Agent David Shaver, head of the digital forensics and research branch of the army's Computer Crime Investigative Unit (CCIU), and Mark Johnson, a digital forensics contractor from ManTech International, who works for the CCIU. They testified that they had found 100,000 State Department cables on a computer Manning had used between November 2009 and May 2010; 400,000 U.S. military reports from Iraq and 91,000 from Afghanistan on the SD card in his aunt's home; and 10,000 cables on his personal MacBook Pro and storage devices that they said had not been passed to WikiLeaks because a file was corrupted. They also said they had recovered an exchange from May 2010 between Manning and Eric Schmiedl, a Boston mathematician, in which Manning said he was the source of the Baghdad helicopter attack ("Collateral Murder") video.

Johnson said he found a text file called wl-press.txt on an external hard drive in Manning's room in Iraq. The file was created on November 30, 2009, and gave the contact detail in Iceland for WikiLeaks. He said he also recovered 14–15 pages of encrypted chats, in unallocated space on Manning's MacBook's hard drive, between Manning and someone believed to be Julian Assange, using the Adium instant messaging client. The MacBook's log-in password, "TWink1492!!", was the encryption key. Two of the chat handles, which used the Berlin Chaos Computer Club's domain (ccc.de), had names associated with them, Julian Assange and Nathaniel Frank. Johnson also said he found SSH logs on the MacBook that showed an SFTP connection, from an IP address that resolved to Manning's aunt's home, to a Swedish IP address with links to WikiLeaks. There was also a text file named "Readme" attached to the logs, apparently written by Manning:

Items of historical significance of two wars Iraq and Afghanistan Significant Activity, Sigacts, between 00001 January 2004 and 2359 31 December 2009 extracts from CSV documents from Department of Defense and CDNE database. These items have already been sanitized of any source identifying information.

You might need to sit on this information for 90 to 180 days to figure out how best to send and distribute such a large amount of data to a large audience and protect the source.

This is possibly one of the most significant documents of our time, removing the fog of war and revealing the true nature of 21st century assymmetric warfare.

Have a good day.

Johnson said there had been two attempts to delete material from the MacBook. The operating system was re-installed in January 2010, and on or around January 31 an attempt was made to erase the hard drive by doing a "zero-fill," which involves overwriting material with zeroes. This process was started, cancelled, then started again with a single pass. The material was recovered after the overwrite attempts from unallocated space.

Defense arguments

Manning's lawyers argued that the government had overstated the harm the release of the documents had caused, and had overcharged Manning to force him to give evidence against Assange. They suggested that other people had had access to Manning's workplace computer, and under cross-examination Shaver acknowledged that some of the 10,000 cables on Manning's personal computer did not match cables published by WikiLeaks. David Coombs asked for the dismissal of any charge related to the use of unauthorized software, arguing that Manning's unit had been "lawless ... when it comes to information assurance."

The defense also raised the issue of whether Manning's gender identity disorder had affected his judgment. Manning had e-mailed his master sergeant, Paul Adkins, in April 2010 to say he was suffering from gender confusion and attaching a photograph of himself dressed as a woman. After Manning's arrest, the army found information about hormone replacement therapy in his room, and his commander, Captain Steven Lim, learned that he had been calling himself Breanna. His lawyers argued that his superiors had failed to provide adequate counseling, and had not taken disciplinary action or revoked his security clearance, and suggested that the "don't ask, don't tell" policy – which was repealed in September 2011 – had made it difficult for Manning to serve in the army as a gay man.

Defense request to depose six witnesses

After the hearing, in January 2012, David Coombs filed a request to depose six witnesses, whose names were redacted in the application, and who are believed to have been involved in classifying the leaked videos. Coombs argues that the videos were not classified at the time they were obtained by WikiLeaks.

Article 39 hearing

An Article 39 hearing was convened on April 24, 2012, during which the judge, Colonel Denise Lind, denied a defense motion to dismiss the charge of aiding the enemy, and ruled that the government must be able to show that Manning knew the enemy would be able to access information on the WikiLeaks site. She ordered the CIA, FBI, DIA, State Department, and Department of Justice to release documents showing their assessment of whether the leaked material had damaged the national interest of the United States. Lind said she would decide after reading the documents whether to make them available to Manning's lawyers. She also ordered forensic imaging of five computers removed from Manning's work station that had not yet been wiped clean.

At the start of the hearing, Manning replaced his two military lawyers, Major Matthew Kemkes and Captain Paul Bouchard, with Captain Joshua Tooman. The next Article 39 hearing was set for June 6–8 and trial was set for September 2012.

Petition to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals

The Center for Constitutional Rights filed a petition in May 2012 asking the Army Court of Criminal Appeals to order press and public access to motion papers, orders, and transcripts. Petitioners included Julian Assange, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now!, Chase Madar, author of The Passion of Bradley Manning (2011), and Glenn Greenwald of Salon.

Motion to dismiss

On September 19, 2012, Manning's attorneys filed a motion to dismiss all charges with prejudice, arguing that Manning has been unable to obtain a speedy trial. The motion claimed that the 845 days he has spent in pretrial confinement is much longer than periods that the Court of Appeals have found to be facially unreasonable. The U.S. military requires a trial within 120 days. Judge Lind ruled against the defense's motion and for the law allows for a delay past 120 days in this case because the prosecution needed more time to prepare its case.

Initial plea

On February 28, 2013, Manning pleaded guilty to 10 of the 22 charges. Military judge Colonel Denise Lind accepted the guilty pleas, for which Manning could face up to 20 years in prison. Manning did not plead guilty to the most significant charge against him, aiding the enemy.

Manning acknowledged having provided archives of military and diplomatic files to WikiLeaks. He pleaded guilty to 10 criminal counts in connection with the material he leaked, which included videos of airstrikes in Iraq and Afghanistan in which civilians were killed, logs of military incident reports, assessment files of detainees held at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and a quarter-million cables from American diplomats stationed around the world. He read a statement recounting how he joined the military, became an intelligence analyst in Iraq, decided that certain files should become known to the American public to prompt a wider debate about foreign policy, downloaded them from a secure computer network and then ultimately uploaded them to WikiLeaks.

When the judge asked Manning to explain how he could admit that his actions were wrong, Manning replied, "Your Honor, regardless of my opinion or my assessment of documents such as these, it's beyond my pay grade – it's not my authority to make these decisions about releasing confidential files." An audio recording of Manning's statement was released by journalist Glenn Greenwald on March 12, 2013.

Manning put the files on a digital storage card for his camera and took it home with him on a leave in early 2010. He then decided to give the files to a newspaper. He first called The Washington Post, but the reporter was not interested. Then he tried to contact The New York Times by calling a phone number for the newspaper's public editor and leaving a voice mail message that was not returned. In January 2010, he called the public editor's line at Bloomberg News but got no response. Later, he copied the files and uploaded them to WikiLeaks, through its website, and later used a directory the group designated for him on a "cloud drop box" server. Manning was frustrated that WikiLeaks did not publish files about 15 people who printed "anti-Iraqi" pamphlets. After uploading the files, he was increasingly engaged in online conversations with someone from WikiLeaks, who Manning said he assumed was a senior figure, like Julian Assange, its founder, but, in retrospect, he said the relationship was "artificial."

Trial

The trial began on June 3, 2013, at Fort Meade, Maryland, before Colonel Denise Lind, chief judge, U.S. Army Trial Judiciary, 1st Judicial Circuit.

Opening for the prosecution, Capt. Joe Morrow accused Manning of having "harvested" hundreds of thousands of documents from secure networks, then making them available within hours to his country's enemies by dumping them on the Internet: "This is a case about what happens when arrogance meets access to classified information," he said. For the defense, David Coombs described Manning as "young, naïve and good intentioned." Coombs recounted an incident in which a convoy was hit by an IED, which U.S. troops were relieved did not result in any American fatalities. Manning was reportedly disturbed by his comrades' lack of sympathy upon later learning that an Iraqi civilian had been killed in the incident. Coombs said that by releasing material he felt the public should see, Manning had hoped to make a difference. Manning additionally believed that much of the information he released was "already basically in the public domain," and that it was of historical importance.

On July 2, at the trial's 14th day of sessions, prosecutors rested their case, having presented testimony from 80 witnesses and evidence showing that Manning's training repeatedly instructed him to not give classified information to unauthorized people. The government also presented evidence that Osama bin Laden asked for and received from an associate the Afghanistan battlefield reports WikiLeaks published, and that al-Qaeda leaders reveled in WikiLeaks' publication of reams of classified U.S. documents, urging members to study them before devising ways to attack the United States.

On July 10, the defense rested its case after presenting evidence from 10 witnesses. PFC Manning did not take the stand. Attempting to undercut the most serious charge against Manning—aiding the enemy—defense lawyers called Harvard Law School professor Yochai Benkler, who testified that until WikiLeaks started publishing the material Manning leaked, even The Pentagon apparently viewed the anti-secrecy website as a legitimate journalistic enterprise. Thereafter, said Benkler, the public, the military and traditional news media perceived WikiLeaks as a group that supported terrorism.

On July 18, Judge Lind rejected a defense motion to dismiss the charge of aiding the enemy, citing Manning's extensive training as an intelligence analyst and the sheer volume of records that were leaked as reasons to allow the charge to proceed. In its rebuttal case, the prosecution entered three tweets from WikiLeaks that Manning may have viewed to show that the organization was not a legitimate journalistic enterprise. In surrebuttal, the defense entered articles into evidence depicting WikiLeaks as an important journalism outlet, a platform "just as important as" the Freedom of Information Act (United States).

On July 25, chief prosecutor Maj. Ashden Fein delivered the government's closing argument, portraying PFC Manning as an "anarchist" who sought to "make a splash" by providing vast archives of secret documents to WikiLeaks. Arguing that Manning must be found guilty of aiding the enemy, Fein said, "He was not a whistleblower. He was a traitor, a traitor who understood the value of compromised information in the hands of the enemy and took deliberate steps to ensure that they, along with the world, received it." Fein contended that Manning's "wholesale and indiscriminate compromise of hundreds of thousands of classified documents" for release by the WikiLeaks staff, whom he called "essentially information anarchists," was not an ordinary journalistic disclosure but a bid for "notoriety, although in a clandestine form." Fein addressed the court for nearly six hours.

The next day, lead defense attorney David Coombs countered with his own closing argument, portraying Manning as "a young, naïve, but good-intentioned soldier who had human life and his humanist beliefs center to his decisions, whose sole focus was, 'Maybe I just can make a difference, maybe make a change.'" Coombs said his client released only files he believed would cause no harm yet spark debate and prompt change, and that if PFC Manning had not been selective, he would have leaked much more. Playing excerpts from the Baghdad helicopter attack ("Collateral Murder") video that Manning admitted supplying to WikiLeaks, Coombs told Judge Lind: "When the court looks at this, the defense requests that you not disengage, that you not look at this from the eyes of 'this happened on a battlefield.' Did they all deserve to die? That is what Private Manning is thinking as he is watching this video he is seeing, and he's questioning."

With closing arguments concluded, Col. Lind began her deliberations to determine a verdict. Manning chose to have his court-martial heard by the judge only instead of a jury. On July 29, the court stated it would announce the judge's verdict on July 30, 2013 at 1 p.m. EST. On July 30, Manning was acquitted of aiding the enemy for giving secrets to WikiLeaks. He was convicted on five espionage counts along with other counts.

See also

Material alleged to have been leaked

• Afghan War logs
• Iraq War logs
• Guantanamo Bay files leak
• United States diplomatic cables leak
• "Collateral Murder" video
• Granai airstrike video

Miscellaneous

• Courts-martial in the United States
• Equal Justice for United States Military Personnel legislation
• Information published by WikiLeaks
• United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Notes

1. ^ Jennifer Rizzo, "Bradley Manning charged", CNN, February 23, 2012.
2. Denver Nicks, "Private Manning and the Making of Wikileaks", This Land, September 23, 2010.
3. "Bradley Manning enters guilty pleas in WikiLeaks case", CBS News, February 28, 2013.
4. ^ Julie Tate and Ellen Nakashima, "Bradley Manning court-martial opens", The Washington Post, June 3, 2013.
5. "Closing arguments conclude; Manning's fate now with judge". CNN. Retrieved 26 July 2013.
6. "Verdict in Manning trial to be read Tuesday". CNN. Retrieved 29 July 2013.
7. Kim Zetter, "Bradley Manning to Face All Charges in Court-Martial", Wired, February 3, 2012.
8. "Attorney for WikiLeaks suspect says he's seen no evidence on documents", CNN, August 31, 2010.
   • "Charge sheet", courtesy of Cryptome, accessed May 4, 2012.
   • "Charge sheet", The Washington Post, accessed April 7, 2012.
9. "WikiLeaks: Bradley Manning faces 22 new charges", CBS News, March 2, 2011.
   • For figures from ABC, see Luis Martinez, "22 New Charges Against Pvt. Bradley Manning, Accused WikiLeaks Source", ABC News, March 2, 2011.
   • Jim Miklaszewski and Courtney Kube, "Manning faces new charges, possible death penalty", msnbc.com, March 2, 2011.
10. "Panel Says WikiLeaks Suspect Is Competent to Stand Trial", Associated Press, April 29, 2011.
11. That he was deemed fit to stand trial, see "Panel Says WikiLeaks Suspect Is Competent to Stand Trial", Associated Press, April 29, 2011.
    • For the lawyers' names, see "PFC Manning, Article 32 Script", courtesy of politico.com, accessed May 9, 2012.
    • For WikiLeaks summaries of the hearings, see:

    • "2011-12-16 Handwritten Transcript of Bradley #Manning's Pretrial Hearing Day 1 #WikiLeaks", WikiLeaks, December 16, 2011.
    • "2011-12-17 Handwritten transcript of Bradley #Manning Pretrial Day 2 #WikiLeaks", WikiLeaks, December 17, 2011.
    • "2011-12-18 Handwritten transcript of Bradley #Manning Pretrial Day 3 #WikiLeaks", WikiLeaks, December 18, 2011.
    • "2011-12-19 Summary of PFC Bradley Manning’s Pre-Trial Hearing, Dec 16-18", WikiLeaks, December 19, 2011.
    • "2011-12-20 Summary: PFC Bradley Manning Pre-Trial Hearing Day 4", WikiLeaks, December 20, 2011.
    • "2011-12-21 Summary: PFC Bradley Manning Pre-Trial Hearing Day 5", WikiLeaks, December 21, 2011.
    • "2011-12-22 Summary: PFC Bradley Manning Pre-Trial Hearing Day 6", WikiLeaks, December 22, 2011.

    • For the order that he stand trial, see Kim Zetter, "Bradley Manning to Face All Charges in Court-Martial", Wired, February 3, 2012.
    • For the formal charging (arraignment), see Jennifer Rizzo, "Bradley Manning charged", CNN, February 23, 2012.
12. Denver Nicks, Private: Bradley Manning, WikiLeaks, and the Biggest Exposure of Official Secrets in American History, Chicago Review Press, 2012, p. 3.
13. Nicks 2012, p. 223.
14. ^ The army investigators' testimony Zetter, December 19, 2011
15. Nicks 2012, pp. 137–138; also see Zetter, December 19, 2011.
16. For the prosecution argument about Manning's "absolute indifference," and for the defense argument about Manning's unit being "lawless," see Serena Marshall, "Court Martial for Bradley Manning in Wikileaks Case?", ABC News, December 22, 2011.
    • For the government overcharging Manning, see Kim Zetter, "Army Piles on Evidence in Final Arguments in WikiLeaks Hearing", Wired, December 22, 2011.
    • For the gender issues, see Kirit Radia and Luis Martinez, "Bradley Manning Defense Reveals Alter Ego Named 'Breanna Manning'", ABC News, December 17, 2011.
    • For Manning facing court martial, see Denver Nicks, "Bradley Manning Likely Faces Court Martial", The Daily Beast, January 13, 2012.
17. David Coombs, "Request for oral depositions", United States v. PFC Bradley Manning, January 12, 2012.
    • Kim Zetter, "Bradley Manning Attorney Wants to Depose Rejected Witnesses", Wired, January 12, 2012.
18. § 839
19. ^ "Bradley Manning Judge to Rule on Request to Drop Charges", ABC News, April 24, 2012.
    • "Bradley Manning Defense Challenges Charge of ‘Aiding the Enemy’", ABC News, April 25, 2012.
    • "No Luck for Bradley Manning: More Motions Denied in WikiLeaks Case", ABC News, April 26, 2012.
20. David Dishneau, "GI Seeks Dismissal of 10 Counts in WikiLeaks Case", Associated Press, 24 May 2012.
    • "Constitutional Rights Attorneys, Media Challenge Secrecy Of Manning Court Martial", Eurasia Review, 24 May 2012.
21. Motion to Dismiss of September 19, 2012 as cited in Nathan Fuller (September 29, 2012) "The government has made an 'absolute mockery' of Bradley Manning’s right to a speedy trial" BradleyManning.org
22. Adam Klasfeld, "Landmark Delays in Manning Court-Martial, Lawyer Says" Courthouse News Service, October 1, 2012.
23. Adam Klasfeld, "Judges Doubt Need for Secrecy in Bradley Manning Court-Martial" Courthouse News Service, October 10, 2012.
24. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/26/bradley-manning-trial-rejects-dismiss-charges?INTCMP=SRCH
25. "Bradley Manning pleads guilty to some Wikileaks charges", BBC News, 28 February 2013.
26. ^ Charlie Savage and Scott Shane (1 March 2013). "Soldier Admits Providing Files To WikiLeaks". The New York Times. p. A1.
27. Glenn Greenwald, “Finally: hear Bradley Manning in his own voice”, The Guardian, March 12, 2013.
28. Judge Advocate General Corps website, last updated September 24, 2012, retrieved July 23, 2013.
29. Paul McGeough, "WikiLeaks trial begins on a low-note", Sydney Morning Herald, June 4, 2013.
30. David Dishneau & Pauline Jelinek, "Prosecution rests in Manning's WikiLeaks trial", Associated Press, July 2, 2013.
31. Associated Press (July 2, 2013). "Prosecution submits al-Qaida excerpts in Wikileaks trial". The Burlington Free Press. Burlington, Vermont. pp. 5A. Retrieved July 2, 2013.
32. Associated Press, "Bradley Manning's defense rests its case in WikiLeaks scandal", Los Angeles Times, July 10, 2013.
33. Julie Tate, "Judge in Bradley Manning trial rejects motion to dismiss key charge", The Washington Post, July 18, 2013.
34. Charlie Savage, "In Closing Argument, Prosecutor Casts Soldier as 'Anarchist' for Leaking Archives", The New York Times, July 25, 2013.
35. Charlie Savage, "Defense Calls Manning's Intentions Good", The New York Times, July 26, 2013.
36. David Dishneau, "Bradley Manning Trial Begins 3 Years After Arrest", Associated Press, June 3, 2013.
37. "Verdict in Manning trial to be read Tuesday". CNN. Retrieved 29 July 2013.
38. "WIKILEAKER PFC. BRADLY MANNING FOUND NOT GUILTY OF MOST SERIOUS CHARGE OF AIDING THE ENEMY". The Blaze. Retrieved 30 July 2013.
39. Dashiell Bennett (2013-07-30). "Bradley Manning Found Not Guilty of Aiding the Enemy". theatlanticwire.com.

Further reading

Articles

• Greenwald, Glenn. "The strange and consequential case of Bradley Manning, Adrian Lamo and WikiLeaks", Salon, June 18, 2010.
• Hansen, Evan. "Manning-Lamo Chat Logs Revealed", Wired magazine, July 13, 2011; archived from the original on March 28, 2012.
• Nakashima, Ellen. "Messages from alleged leaker Bradley Manning portray him as despondent soldier", The Washington Post, June 10, 2010.
• Nicks, Denver. "Private Manning and the Making of Wikileaks", This Land, September 23, 2010.
• Pilkington, Ed. "Bradley Manning defence rests after calling just 10 witnesses." The Guardian/ Wednesday 10 July 2013.

Books

• Assange, Julian; O'Hagan, Andrew. Julian Assange: The Unauthorised Autobiography. Canongate, 2011.
• Brooke, Heather. The Revolution Will Be Digitised. William Heinemann, 2011.
• Domscheit-Berg, Daniel. Inside WikiLeaks. Doubleday, 2011.
• Fowler, Andrew. The Most Dangerous Man in the World. Skyhorse Publishing, 2011.
• Leigh, David; Harding, Luke. WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange's War on Secrecy. Guardian Books, 2011.
• Madar, Chase. The Passion of Bradley Manning. OR Books, 2012.
• Mitchell, Greg; Gosztola, Kevin. Truth and Consequences: The U.S. vs. Bradley Manning. Sinclair Books, 2012.

Video

• Smith, Martin. "The Private Life of Bradley Manning", PBS Frontline, March 2011.

Websites

• The Law Offices of David E. Coombs, Bradley Manning's lawyer, accessed April 7, 2012.
• Unofficial trial transcripts from the Freedom of the Press Foundation
• What Happened At Bradley Manning’s Hearing This Week? The 300,000 documents, Arun Rath,, PBS Frontline, December 22, 2011.
• "Witness: Manning said leak would lift 'fog of war'"Army investigators, including the reference to Eric Schmiedl, see David Dishneau and Pauline Jelinek, Associated Press, December 19, 2011
• "Investigators link WikiLeaks suspect to Assange", Agence France-Presse, December 20, 2011.

v t e United States Military Judicial Authority
Military justice Law of the United States
Authority	United States Constitution, Article I Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
Standards	Manual for Courts-Martial Convening authority
Judge Advocate General's Corps (JAG)	Army Judge Advocate General's Corps, Army (Army JAG) Marine Corps Marine Corps Judge Advocate Division Navy Judge Advocate General's Corps, Navy (Navy JAG) Air Force Judge Advocate General's Corps, Air Force Coast Guard Coast Guard Legal Division
Non-judicial punishment	UCMJ Article 15 Military tribunals in the United States
Court systems	Trial Courts-martial Guantanamo military commissions Appeal Army Court of Criminal Appeals Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals Court of Military Commission Review Discretionary review Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Supreme Court

v t e United States Army
Leadership	Secretary of the Army Under Secretary of the Army Chief of Staff Vice Chief of Staff 4-star generals 3-star generals 1798–1959 1990–1999 2000–2009 2010–2019 2020–present Army Staff Senior Warrant Officer Sergeant Major of the Army House Armed Services Committee (House Subcommittee on Air and Land Forces) Senate Committee on Armed Services (Senate Subcommittee on Air and Land Forces)
Components and commands	Regular Army Army Reserve Army National Guard Active Units Reorganization plan of United States Army Commands Forces Futures Materiel Training and Doctrine Service components Central Europe and Africa Pacific North South Special Operations Surface Deployment and Distribution Space and Missile Defense Cyber Command Direct reporting units Second Army Medical Intelligence and Security Criminal Investigation Division Corps of Engineers Military District of Washington Test and Evaluation Military Academy Reserve Acquisition Support Center Installation Management War College Field armies First Third Fifth Sixth Seventh Eighth Ninth Branches Acquisition Corps Adjutant General's Corps Air Defense Artillery Branch Armor Branch Aviation Branch Army Band Chaplain Corps Chemical Corps Civil Affairs Corps Corps of Engineers Cyber Corps Dental Corps Field Artillery Branch Finance Corps Infantry Branch Inspector General's Corps Judge Advocate General's Corps Logistics Branch Medical Corps Medical Service Corps Medical Specialist Corps Military Intelligence Corps Military Police Corps Nurse Corps Ordnance Corps Psychological operations Quartermaster Corps Signal Corps Special Forces Transportation Corps Veterinary Corps
Installations	United States and overseas Germany Japan Kuwait South Korea
Training	Basic Training BOLC ROTC (ECP) OCS WOBC WOCS Military Academy (West Point) MOS
Uniforms and insignia	Awards and decorations Badges Branch Officer Warrant Enlisted World War I World War II Uniforms
Equipment	Individual weapons Crew-served weapons Vehicles
Premier ensembles	Army Field Band Army Band Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps West Point Band
History and traditions	History Continental Army Union army National Army Army of the United States Center of Military History Institute of Heraldry America's Army Army Art Program Flag National Museum West Point Museum Rangers U.S. Army Regimental System Soldier's Creed "The Army Goes Rolling Along" Division nicknames Draft Service numbers Seventh Army Symphony Orchestra
Historical	Buffalo Soldiers Army Air Forces Army Service Forces Women's Army Corps Rough Riders U.S. Cavalry United States Colored Troops United States Army Hospital Corps U.S. Sanitary Commission
Category

• United States military case law
• Iraq War legal issues
• WikiLeaks
• United States diplomatic cables leak
• United States lawsuits
• 2013 in the United States