This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Daveosaurus (talk | contribs) at 02:44, 15 September 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:44, 15 September 2013 by Daveosaurus (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Phoenix and Winslow
Phoenix and Winslow (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix and Winslow/Archive.
15 September 2013
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Scoobydunk (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Liangshan Yi (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- GoodeOldeboy (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Goodoldeboy has already been blocked as a sock but doesn't seem to have been reported here so is only included for the record. Comment on P&W's talk page "It should be noted that it appeared you went through some lengths to attempt to avoid detection" probably should also be included for the record. For this reason I am including Liangshan Yi who has already been checked but who has broken a silence of some months to revert removal of a tendentious P&W edit here: . Scoobydunk appears to be a brand new editor whose very first edit was to launch into an article WLRoss (an editor with whom P&W has been feuding for a few years) had been editing; with a suspiciously precocious grasp of WP jargon in the edit summaries and . Daveosaurus (talk) 02:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: