Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Objective validity of astrology - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Marskell (talk | contribs) at 16:05, 9 June 2006 (afd2). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:05, 9 June 2006 by Marskell (talk | contribs) (afd2)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Objective validity of astrology

Fundamental concern is that this is a POV-fork used as a platform to present questionable, obscure astrological research that would not pass WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV on a more frequented page. The one entry here that has received suffecient attention to warrant Wiki-coverage is the Mars effect, which has its own page. The main astrology article has a section which can be expanded somewhat to include any other critical points. We have an astrology and astronomy to boot, which we can use if we really need comparative analysis. The page is also a gawdawful mess which is constantly being reverted over. Delete. Marskell 16:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)