This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zer0faults (talk | contribs) at 10:55, 11 June 2006 (→RFC). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:55, 11 June 2006 by Zer0faults (talk | contribs) (→RFC)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
|
- Archive: /LJS All comments related to vandal LJS and socks
- Archive: /Merecat All comments related to vandal Merecat and socks
- Archive: /Misc Misc obsolete comments
Response
No problem with the cleanup, everybody's userpage is a valuable resource here. ;-) I just stummbled across the message on your userpage when I was following a users contributions, so I moved it. Hope I didn't do anything I wasn't supposed to do. ;-) Cheers! DGX 23:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Wishing you well
Vandal blocked
You were correct on page TdF/John316. Confirmed: User:Wombdpsw has been identified as a notorious vandal using many usernames before, such as "Merecat" and "Rex071404". He's been blocked indefinitely. (see userpages or clerk's report) -- ActiveSelective 06:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Possible Sock?
I just found this on this page. Followed up the IP address, only one other contribution today and not on an article I edited. Looks to me as if Merecat or an accomplice is back to his old tricks and this is meant to provide 'evidence' in one of his future attacks under his new nym. --Gorgonzilla 22:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Your test didn't work. Your vandalism has been reverted. In the future use the sandbox for such nonsense. --138.162.5.8 20:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
RFC
I removed your comments as you put them in the wrong place, you do not get to comment in that area. I also find it interesting that you choose to comment on my RFC even though I have had no contact with you and neither has any of the other users. How did you even find the RFC? --zero faults 17:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Just to keep you updated. Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_checkuser#Merecat. I hope you do the responcible thins now that this has been put to bed finally. --zero faults 10:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)