This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ste4k (talk | contribs) at 20:18, 19 June 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:18, 19 June 2006 by Ste4k (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)curses are not real
Just to be clear, Ste4k, there is not actually such a thing as a "curse", as you seem to believe in your persistent insertion of a weird story about a "cursed newsgroup". Please stop adding this silliness to an otherwise fine article. Sdedeo (tips) 23:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments Sdedeo, and I appreciate your further comments on the Talk:Curse about the rephrasing of the section to avoid such an interpretation in the future: "Congrats on rephrasing the paragraph so as not to claim the existence of a real live internet curse. -- Sdedeo (tips) 23:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)" Ste4k 17:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions made on June 19 2006 (UTC) to Curse
 |
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. |
Thank you Mr. Connolly, for bringing this matter to my attention. I am sorry that you hadn't the time to read the discussion in Talk:Curse or check to see that the revisions made had changed the content. I have taken the time that you set aside for me to become more familiar with the 3RR. I have also become more aware of the purposes of the Talk pages. Thanks again. Ste4k 17:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- But you have also leapt straight back into reverting, so you get another block: 24h this time William M. Connolley 20:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- On the contrary, the revert was made to prevent vandalism, and proper procedure for preventing vandalism
- was followed. Ste4k 20:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)