User talk:InShaneee - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SyaahQalam (talk | contribs) at 13:22, 16 June 2014 (→ProPakistani). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:22, 16 June 2014 by SyaahQalam (talk | contribs) (→ProPakistani)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Click here to start a new talk section.

Corner Tube Boilers: rewritten

Hello InShaneee I wrote my first article about the concept of Cornertube boilers on 16th Jan 2013 which was nominated and hence deleted speedily because of lack of notability and copyright infringement policy of WP. I have rewritten the article this time without any copy-paste methods and with third party resources and its still in process in my sandbox. I would like to ask for your opinion and comments on the present article and in case I have done some mistake which will nominate it for speedy deletion it is completely UNINTENTIONAL. Thank you for your time and effort to make this article better in advance. Ghorpaapi (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind, but I copyedited the article in your sandbox a bit for clarity. Overall, I think it's a good article. Just a few points:

Since 'corner tube boiler' isn't a proper noun, make sure not to capitalize it.
If I were you, I'd remove the letters in the Working section; since the diagram is already labeled, it's just interrupting the flow of the paragraph.
That external link at the bottom needs to go. Per WP:EL, it doesn't add much in the way of extra information, it's not in english, and as a vendor site, it's inappropriate anyway.

Other than those points, I think this is an article that's ready for publishing. Good job! InShaneee (talk) 09:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the editing, motivation and feedback . I am still going to improve this article and use the left over thirdparty resources which I still have to add value and content to this concept. I am going to remove the external link and add another source which will suffice the quote for different fuels. Ghorpaapi (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Outsoles

Hello InShaneee. Can you please delete the page Outsoles? t meets speedy deletion criteria A5 and A10. Thank you. ~~JHUbal27 05:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Looks like someone beat me to it and redirected it to Shoes, which seems like a good option. Sorry I didn't see this right away! InShaneee (talk) 05:08, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

ProPakistani

I'm not sure, it is a borderline submission, but would you accept the submission now or does it fail under WP:1News? mabdul (public) 12:49, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Blah...I'm still not seeing anything directly about the site in any of the references. The PKNIC thing is definitely noteworthy, but I'm not sure that it justifies the whole article. I really wish Abuzarsajjad had gotten back to me about possible sources in Urdu, because I do get the feeling this site might be something within Pakistan and nearby, but googling in english just doesn't turn up anything but promotional sites for me. I specifically avoided the AfC because I don't want to look like judge, jury, and executioner here, but if it were me, I'd say this article still falls into the "almost there" pile. InShaneee (talk) 02:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I was really unsure about that article and thought something like "AGF, borderline, but AGF", but when moving/accepting the page protection stopped me. I really need to add a warning to the tool checking the deletion log. This would really help even experienced editors!

Thanks, I will decline it now. mabdul 05:24, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Sir If you see ProPakistani Rank 65th in Pakistan and 7,020 worldwide. 90.6% visitors are from Pakistan. In technology ProPakistani is first website in mind in Pakistan. Afterwards many International and National Newspapers, TV Channels like BBC, Express Tribune, Telegraph also used their reporting stories. I Know this is not a proper Reason for Article creation. I was not promoting ProPakistani, I have no link with ProPakistani.

At 3G technology auction ProPakistani also reported entire event there was 1,850 Comments.

This story is in Urdu It's clear that BBC named Aamir Attaa (ProPakistani Founder) as Pakistan's IT Expert. May be you say all of these points doesn't clarify the value of article but that website is widely appreciated in Pakistan. If you have any doubt Please check there social profiles on Twitter, Facebook

This is a late reply because I see this today. Muhammad Abuzar Sajjad (talk) 13:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification

I just wanted to let you know that I've made reference to past incidents involving yourself from several years back in an ArbCom case statement. It was for purely contextual purposes, and I did not intent to cast you in a negative light. Kurtis 08:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

"...additional history of vindictiveness and inappropriate decisions"; I'd hate to see what casting me in a negative light would actually consist of, then. InShaneee (talk) 10:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)