Misplaced Pages

:Requests for mediation/GamerGate (controversy) - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Retartist (talk | contribs) at 04:28, 14 October 2014 (→GamerGate (controversy): removing duplicate listing of me). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:28, 14 October 2014 by Retartist (talk | contribs) (→GamerGate (controversy): removing duplicate listing of me)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

GamerGate (controversy)

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.
Editors involved in this dispute
  1. Retartist (talk · contribs) – filing party
  2. PseudoSomething (talk · contribs)
  3. Masem (talk · contribs)
  4. Ryulong (talk · contribs)
  5. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk · contribs)
  6. TheRedPenOfDoom (talk · contribs)
  7. The_Devil%27s_Advocate (talk · contribs)
  8. Ranze (talk · contribs)
  9. Willhesucceed (talk · contribs)
  10. Tarc (talk · contribs)
Articles affected by this dispute
  1. Talk:Gamergate controversy (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.
Primary issues (added by the filing party)
  1. The reliability and validity of a variety of sources as discussed on the talk page and DRN case
  2. The perceived biased against gamergate in the article
  3. User civility
  4. Blp Issues
  5. Weighting of the article
  6. the presentation of opinions as fact
Additional issues (added by other parties)
  • Additional issue 1
  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.
  1. Agree. Retartist (talk) 04:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.
Category: