This is an old revision of this page, as edited by William Pietri (talk | contribs) at 02:27, 18 July 2006 (added explanation to make mysterious removal clearer). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:27, 18 July 2006 by William Pietri (talk | contribs) (added explanation to make mysterious removal clearer)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Refactored comment later removed from AfD discussion. -- NORTH 00:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- deleted libel as per Wiki talk page policy ******
- I tried to remove the above libel, but it was reverted with the claim that it is sourced. It isn't, as an inspection of the "source" shows. --Michael C. Price 01:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Libelous or not, we can't pretend it never happened. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with HowlinWolf's statement; I'm just maintaining the discussion. -- NORTH 01:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, Michael. I'm not sure wholesale deletion was necessary; I think a comment that in your view he was wrong would have sufficed. For those wondering, the removed content was a claim by a new user that "Langdon is a known fraud", with a link to this site: . I agree that the claim isn't supported by the link, although it does appear that Langdon was in violation of the law. Why this would matter for deciding whether to keep the Mega Society article, I can't fathom. William Pietri 02:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)