Misplaced Pages

Perinçek v. Switzerland

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 163.158.187.197 (talk) at 02:51, 29 January 2015 (→Appeal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:51, 29 January 2015 by 163.158.187.197 (talk) (→Appeal)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
It has been suggested that this article be merged into Doğu Perinçek. (Discuss) Proposed since April 2014.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Perinçek v. Switzerland" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
The topic of this article may not meet Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted.
Find sources: "Perinçek v. Switzerland" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. Please help improve this article by looking for better, more reliable sources. Unreliable citations may be challenged and removed. (April 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Perinçek v. Switzerland
CourtEuropean Court of Human Rights
Decided17 December 2013

Perinçek v. Switzerland is a 2013 judgment of the European Court of Human Rights(ECHR) concerning the freedom of expression of Doğu Perinçek, a one time Chairman of the Turkish Workers’ Party who was convicted following comments denying the Armenian Genocide. The case is before the Grand Chamber after Switzerland's appeal with a hearing scheduled in January 2015.

Background

Doğu Perinçek is a Turkish political activist who has repeatedly called the Armenian Genocide of 1915–1917 a lie on his visits to Switzerland. In 2007 he was found guilty by a Swiss court for denying the Armenian Genocide in violation of Swiss anti-racism legislation. He was sentenced to 90 days imprisonment and fined 3000 Swiss francs.

Judgment

In December 2013 the European Court of Human Rights ruled by 5-2 that Switzerland had violated Doğu Perinçek's freedom of expression.

Appeal

After the ruling the government of Switzerland announced its decision to appeal the court’s ruling. On 3 June 2014 the ECHR accepted the appeal to move on to the Grand Chamber to clarify the scope available to Swiss authorities in applying the Swiss Criminal Code to combat racism.

The first hearing took take place on 28 January 2015 with Armenia represented by Doughty Street Chambers. A video of the first hearing of the appeal can be found on the website of the European Court for Human Rights.

Reaction

Positive

Professor Dirk Voorhoof of Ghent University wrote a positive critique of the judgment and argues that it "would certainly be a sad day for freedom of expression in Europe" if the judgment was successfully appealed to the Grand Chamber.

Doğu Perinçek was released at March 10th 2014, by courtesy of the judgement of Grand National Assembly of Turkey on lawlessness of Private Criminal Courts.

Critical

The Armenian writer Harut Sassounian writing for the Asbarez Newspaper states "The Court’s verdict, as it stands, is an endorsement of the denialist stance of both Turkey and Perincek, who is currently serving a life sentence in a Turkish jail for engaging in criminal activity!".

See also

References

  1. "Case Law, Strasbourg: Perinçek v. Switzerland, conviction for denying the Armenian "genocide" breaches Article 10 – Dirk Voorhoof – Inforrm's Blog". inforrm.wordpress.com. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
  2. "Conviction for denial of Armenia genocide - humanrights.ch". humanrights.ch. 2011-01-12. Retrieved 2014-04-04.
  3. European Rights Court Agrees to Hear Swiss Appeal on Perincek Ruling. Asbarez. 3 June 2014. Retrieved 3 June 2014
  4. Völkermord-Urteil wird überprüft. (German) Neue Zürcher Zeitung. 3 June 2014. Retrieved 3 June 2014
  5. Squires, Nick (12 January 2015). "Amal Clooney takes on Armenia genocide case in European court". The Daily Telegraph.
  6. "Switzerland Must Appeal European Court's Verdict on the Armenian Genocide | Asbarez Armenian News". asbarez.com. Retrieved 2014-04-04.

External links


Stub icon

This human rights-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: