This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Uncle G (talk | contribs) at 02:08, 22 July 2006 (I am reminded.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:08, 22 July 2006 by Uncle G (talk | contribs) (I am reminded.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Self-contradiction
Misplaced Pages is not a publisher of original thought - This seems to be a personal essay Neilajh 00:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- AI created the article in view of apparent need for it to exist - there was a link to it AI noticed while browsing semiotics related articles (IIRC) and it was marked red (a double bracketed term leading to non-existing article). It can surely be improved and various terms might need further explanation or maybe I lack proper scientific vocabulary for some concepts and therefore you think these are some invented or taken out of the hat terms. You stated it well - it seems to be a personal essay, just like you seem to me to be a newbie who recently read the deletion policy and is in overzealous stage. Oh,BTW - your sentence is self-contradictory - every article on Misplaced Pages written by a single person is a personal essay on some subject. There are new technologies appearing every day - are you going to delete articles aboot them on a notion that they constitute a description of original thought? Again, self-contradiction. Fortunately, I managed to define it, although it should be impossible by definition to define self-contradiction. I guess there is more in me than it seems to. Listen to the song "As A Child" by "Suzanne Vega" (or read the lyrics on vega.net) to get my point even harder. Milk and kisses! 01:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Agquarx (talk • contribs)
- Please read Misplaced Pages:No_original_research. We can have articles on new technologies, once they have been written about elsewhere in reliable sources. Misplaced Pages summarizes knowledge available elsewhere, we don't create anything new as that is not the purpose of an encylopedia. --Xyzzyplugh 02:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete OR. Nom is right. Fan-1967 01:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- I can almost hear Geogre saying "Deep Thoughts". This article cites no sources, and presents a completely idiosyncratic view of the topic. There's probably an encyclopaedia article to be had on this subject, but this most certainly is not it. Nor is it a decent stub that can be expanded. Delete and let the redlinks stand. Uncle G 01:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete violates Misplaced Pages:No_original_research --Xyzzyplugh 02:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)