Misplaced Pages

User talk:Lips Are Movin

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lips Are Movin (talk | contribs) at 05:28, 10 June 2015 (→Thanks: +). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:28, 10 June 2015 by Lips Are Movin (talk | contribs) (→Thanks: +)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This user prefers to receive notifications. Please use {{ping}} or {{reply to}} when you reply to this user on other pages. No talkback messages are needed.

Archives

1, 2


Dear Future Husband question

Would it be appropriate to add to the page that there is a version released to Radio Disney that has altered lyrics, and then add the before and after altered lyrics? Thanks. ilovechristianmusic 17:38, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

If it's reliably sourced it would be notable, though I think stating which lyrics were altered would be unnecessary. - Lips 17:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)Reliable sources alone do not establish notability. See this for more. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 20:38, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
The fact the song had to have its lyrics altered for a release on a major radio station in the US is a notable enough inclusion if reliably sourced, is it not? - Lips 20:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
@Lips Are Movin: Thank you for your help.
@Winkelvi: How am I being a page stalker? ilovechristianmusic 13:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
TPS is indicating to the userspace inhabitant that I am responding because the page is on my watchlist or I noticed the discussion. It's not saying you are a TPS. Lips, you seem to have a misconception regarding what makes for notability in relation to articles and content. Please read WP:NOTABILITY to get a clearer picture. One or two reliable source mentions may not give that content the notability required for inclusion. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
I think you maybe misinterpreted what I meant with "If it's reliably sourced it would be notable". I definitely did not mean just anything could be included if it's sourced, but in ILCM's case, the info he/she wants to include is indeed notable. I am familiar with WP:NOTABILITY, but a reminder is of course never harmless so ty for the tip! - Lips 17:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your post on Winkelvi's talk page. That showed real class. --NeilN 05:13, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I felt very much guilty and embarrassed reading back on the personal attacks I made. A learning experience. - Lips 05:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)