This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheGracefulSlick (talk | contribs) at 12:25, 4 July 2015 (→friendly advice: Remove trolling, no longer bringing relevant comments to discussion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:25, 4 July 2015 by TheGracefulSlick (talk | contribs) (→friendly advice: Remove trolling, no longer bringing relevant comments to discussion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | 2005 is currently feeling discouraged about Misplaced Pages and is taking an off-and-on wikibreak due to loss of motivation. Your help in cheering this user up would be appreciated. |
 Archives |
|
No Drama Zone
This page is a no drama zone. Please do not add soap opera or other personal drama content to this page as it will only be removed. Please only add content relating to the creation and improvement of articles, or the overall encyclopedia guidelines and policies. Thanks. 2005 (talk) 23:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| I, Sirex98 hereby award The Barnstar of Diligence to 2005 for extensive work in articles, due to a large body of contributions and having a keen eye for detail on various edits made on Misplaced Pages |
Thanks for your contributions...
|
The Gambler's Barnstar | |
| On October 25, 2009 Evercat hereby presents you with the first ever Gambler's Barnstar for your unceasing work on keeping gambling-related articles free from spam. |
Global account
Hi 2005! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Cheer up, dude! :)
MaRAno 07:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Please review
Hey man - I'm not trying to spam/do purely promotional links. Please See North American Gambling Treatment Centers
As there are only 3, and one has been banned from making direct links for too much black hat advertising, I'm doing my best to make it neutral. Suggestions would be appreciated, I feel the remainder of my sentences contributed to the community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johncab593 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- There are many treatment centers for people with gambling addiction, not just three. Please don't add content that says there are just three, especially content that quotes those three centers saying they are the only three. 2005 (talk) 23:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
friendly advice
As you seem to have these issues with many people the solution seems very simple. Some people don't appreciate your attitude and the way you try to own the whole poker topic. Learn to get along with others, be nice and be open to collaboration -- and maybe you can keep some of your pet BLP's. Continue on with this approach and people will keep making things hard for you out of spite. Your choice. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 08:51, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think you should threaten User:2005 by saying "others" will make things difficult when you are under investigation for sock puppetry and edit-warring.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- Others means people other than me. Thus it's not possible for that to be a threat. Hope that helps. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 09:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- Handpolk Simply meant it could be implied since you clearly have a grudge against 2005 and have strong evidence against you for sock puppetry, though I won't accuse you of it.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 09:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- This 'strong evidence' consists of me nominating dozens of articles for deletion and this editor having edited one of them -- and my citing 'the spirit of IAR' one time and this other editor having a thing for that policy. I'm not sure that would hold up in court. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 09:51, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- Handpolk Simply meant it could be implied since you clearly have a grudge against 2005 and have strong evidence against you for sock puppetry, though I won't accuse you of it.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 09:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- Others means people other than me. Thus it's not possible for that to be a threat. Hope that helps. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 09:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
And for you, Handpolk, you can perhaps tone down your highly aggressive behaviour and stop handing out warnings like cookies. Ow, and hiding all those warning you have received will not help much. The Banner talk 10:52, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Category: