This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kappa (talk | contribs) at 15:26, 17 February 2006 (proposed: Tilt Down Men). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:26, 17 February 2006 by Kappa (talk | contribs) (proposed: Tilt Down Men)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) |
| Deletion Sorting Project |
|---|
|
|
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to the Philippines. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Philippines|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to the Philippines. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Misplaced Pages's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
| Purge page cache | watch |
Philippines
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:52, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
Castelo, Erik Joseph de Guzman
Despite many claims of notability, it seems that this young man's notability is mostly in his own mind. Vanity. Zoe 06:23, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Zoe, can't this be A7'd?. Dottore So 06:48, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- I wish, but if I did, there would be an uproar because of all his claims. Zoe 07:01, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
- A7'd? What's that? --Blackcap | talk 07:42, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
- WP:CSD. Original author requests deletion. The original author blanked the page after I put the vfd header on it, and I reverted it, the noted Dottore is suggesting that that qualifies as a request for speedy deletion, but I'd rather be safe than sorry. If another admin disagrees, then by all means, go ahead and delete. Zoe 07:48, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable. --Blackcap | talk 06:51, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, being the editor for a school newspaper and the vice president of a student council are not by any stretch notable. - Mgm| 08:06, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I would even have sppedied it as nn-bio. --DrTorstenHenning 11:46, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete with no objection to the author having same/similar on their user page. Alf 13:11, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- What? Non-Notable? But he has "actively participated in various extra-curricular activities of the school"... If this could be moved to his userpage, I'd suggest that. Otherwise Delete...--Isotope23 14:15, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable - Tεxτurε 16:25, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Coffee 10:22, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Kantutan
dicdef Wyss 03:03, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- Provisional keep. Looking through the Google summaries and following a few of the links (don't do this at work!) would appear to suggest that, actually, it might be a fetish (or similar) to do with Filipino women. There are at least a few sites that pick up the term. So I would hazard a guess that someone who can read more of the sites than I can might be able to extract an article from this. If this proves not to be possible toward the end of the VfD, I'll change my mind. -Splash 03:55, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I don't know how you can expand this into an article --Dysepsion 04:17, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unless expanded from dicdef to article. MCB 06:40, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. It looks to me that this is just a Filipino word that describes acts that are already covered here. This is an English language encyclopedia and I don't think we want to start adding non-English equivalents of common terms unless there is some evidence that the word is also widely adopted by English speakers. -- DS1953 06:43, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete --Agamemnon2 11:08, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:45, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
Pindut
Delete Non-notable slang. Used by a small number of people only. Kontrovert 16:15, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Kontrovert. Tonywalton | Talk 17:10, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete; non-notable. Jaxl | talk 17:19, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete useless non-worthy stuff.
- Delete as per User:Kontrovert. *drew 03:30, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.