This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kaldari (talk | contribs) at 22:41, 6 November 2015 (→GamerGate Sanctions Notice). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:41, 6 November 2015 by Kaldari (talk | contribs) (→GamerGate Sanctions Notice)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Domestic violence and intersex couples
You reverted my inclusion in the domestic violence article of intersex couples? My understanding is that intersex couples exist? Am I missing something? Please explain. Seems like intersex couples can also be victims of DV? I have not reverted your revert. thanks.Charlotte135 (talk) 01:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Charlotte135: Intersex persons generally identify as either male or female, and thus consider themselves either heterosexual or homosexual. There are of course some who identify as neither male nor female and are thus transgender (which is an umbrella term including transmen, transwomen, and non-binary genders). So all the relationship possibilities of intersex couples are already covered. Kaldari (talk) 02:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Similarly can be stated of transgender people, who usually identify as male/man or female/woman (at least when not using the term transgender as an umbrella term), which is why I was going to revert Charlotte135 on the transgender addition. "Transgender relationships"? How do we define that, given gender identity? And where are the sources in the article discussing domestic violence among transgender people? Flyer22 (talk) 02:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Flyer22: That's a good point. I would support removing transgender as well, especially if it isn't discussed in the article body. Kaldari (talk) 03:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Similarly can be stated of transgender people, who usually identify as male/man or female/woman (at least when not using the term transgender as an umbrella term), which is why I was going to revert Charlotte135 on the transgender addition. "Transgender relationships"? How do we define that, given gender identity? And where are the sources in the article discussing domestic violence among transgender people? Flyer22 (talk) 02:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ok. Thanks for your reply Kaldari. I saw a documentary on intersex couples. Interestingly both were intersex and neither identified as either male or female. Anyway I thought I would add this group to represent them in the article. However I won't dispute your revert further. Flyer 22 I feel you are following me by commenting here. I asked you why you were being so aggressive toward me on the domestic violence talk page and would still like to know? But yeah...i think its a bit strange you appear on another editor's talk page when I was asking them a question? Kaldari, what is your opinion on me adding transgender couples that flyer 22 says they are going to delete? I just feel we need to be inclusive in the article of minority groups affected by domestic violence?Charlotte135 (talk) 03:17, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- I may ask that question on the article talk page? Maybe it would be good to add something in the body of the article then? Kaldari what is your opinion based on the doco I watched where both members of the intersex couple did not identify as either male or female? Are they not able to be victims or perpetrators of DV too? We need to be inclusive IMO....?Charlotte135 (talk) 03:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- I think that probably transgender couples, if discussed in the body of the article, should be included at least?Charlotte135 (talk) 03:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Charlotte135: If there are any reliable sources discussing DV in transgender relationships, you are welcome to add it to the article body (with proper citations). The lead should be a summary of the content in the body, however, and not include original research or statements not reflected in the body. Kaldari (talk) 03:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ok. Thanks.Charlotte135 (talk) 04:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Charlotte135: If there are any reliable sources discussing DV in transgender relationships, you are welcome to add it to the article body (with proper citations). The lead should be a summary of the content in the body, however, and not include original research or statements not reflected in the body. Kaldari (talk) 03:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- I think that probably transgender couples, if discussed in the body of the article, should be included at least?Charlotte135 (talk) 03:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- I may ask that question on the article talk page? Maybe it would be good to add something in the body of the article then? Kaldari what is your opinion based on the doco I watched where both members of the intersex couple did not identify as either male or female? Are they not able to be victims or perpetrators of DV too? We need to be inclusive IMO....?Charlotte135 (talk) 03:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Tech News: 2015-41
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The link editor in the visual editor now shows results below the search box. This improves the usability on desktop and mobile.
- The description at Special:ChangeEmail now clearly explains that the page can also be used to remove your email.
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from October 6. It will be on non-Misplaced Pages wikis from October 7. It will be on all Wikipedias from October 8 (calendar).
- UploadWizard will remind users to add a category.
- UploadWizard's category selectors will be easier to use.
- A new Cite error will be shown if a named reference is defined more than once in the same article.
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on 6 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Wikidata requests your input on how to improve the editing of Wikidata's data in other locations, such as Wikipedias.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Taylor Swift#Singer-songwriter
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Taylor Swift#Singer-songwriter. Thanks. Calidum 01:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Template:Z48
Tech News: 2015-42
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The database size lists have been updated. These control special page update frequency and which wikis use global abuse filters.
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from October 13. It will be on non-Misplaced Pages wikis from October 14. It will be on all Wikipedias from October 15 (calendar).
- You will be able to upload images to Wikimedia Commons using the visual editor. When the image is uploaded it will be added to the article you're editing.
- Pages that show citation error messages will automatically be placed in a hidden category.
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 13 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
sugar price graph
Kaldari your sugar price graph request is done, if your satisfied with the file please mark with
Resolved tag
so we can archive it - Cheers FOX 52 (talk) 16:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Folger image upload again
Hi Kaldari,
Sorry to nag on you, I'm sure you've got more than enough on your plate as it is. But regarding my previous question (your response); have you had any chance to look at this?
Note that I'm not requesting that you do any GLAM outreach or anything. Back in 2012, Missvain posted a request to the WP:BARD talk page suggesting the Folger needed help uploading their collections (presumably to Commons), and that interested editors should get in touch with you. I'm just trying to find out more about that request, as it was made back in 2012, and what happened with it afterwards (I see it got no response from the WikiProject). Where did the request come from? Did the Folger get in touch with anyone? Did we contact the Folger? Was there a Visiting Scholar setup there at the time? Did they get their collections uploaded? Do they still need assistance? What sort of assistance? And so forth. Thanks in advance, --Xover (talk) 05:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Xover: The last update we received from Folger was that they were putting the donation on hold pending the hiring of a Director of Digital Access. That was 3 years ago. Kaldari (talk) 16:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Xover: I've pinged the new Director of Digital Access at the Folger to see if he's interested in restarting the process. Kaldari (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. For reference, I am willing to help out with such a project in any way I can. Slow burn manual uploads, scripting it if there's sufficient support for that (APIs, structured data), etc. and I have a passing familiarity with the Shakespeare field if that would help for this particular case. I can't promise oodles of time or predictable time-tables, and can't necessarily commit to anything very long term, but within those limits I'm motivated to help. Also, I believe @Thedarklady154: is based at the Folger in some capacity (that I've not quite grasped, but which seems apposite here). --Xover (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Tech News: 2015-43
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Tech News is trying to make reading the newsletter easier. The
icon means the item is in the newsletter every week, but with new dates. The 
icon means the item is mainly relevant for readers with technical knowledge. You can leave feedback on this change. - Timestamps in the protection log will now be in the user's timezone. Previously they would show Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
Problems
- A problem with MediaWiki made some pages show no content on October 14. This has now been fixed.
- Some templates were misplaced in the Flow description bar. This could make it impossible to click on links. This will be fixed this week.
- The deployment of the new MediaWiki version was stopped on October 14. No new code was deployed for the rest of week. This meant planned changes did not happen.
Changes this week
- Changes that were planned to happen last week will happen this week.
- Wikispecies, Meta and MediaWiki.org will be able to use Wikidata for sitelinks.
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 20 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hot articles for medicine?
Hi Kaldari, is there any chance the hot articles bot could be made to run for the medicine wikiproject? It has far more than 10,000 articles (~30,000) but I hoped it might run on larger wikiprojects as well nowadays. --WS (talk) 10:17, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Wouterstomp: I would be willing to try it, but in order for it to work there has to be a category that includes all of your project's articles directly (rather than in subcategories). (I know that's a weird requirement, but it's the only way that the query can run efficiently.) You can do this by creating an new category like Category:All WikiProject Medicine articles and adding "MAIN_CAT = All WikiProject Medicine articles" to {{WikiProject Medicine}}. You could also make your existing Category:WikiProject Medicine articles the MAIN_CAT, although that might be awkward since all the articles are already included in subcategories there. I would recommend discussing this with other members of your project first. Kaldari (talk) 23:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks I will discuss it. --WS (talk) 13:37, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Tech News: 2015-44
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from October 27. It will be on non-Misplaced Pages wikis from October 28. It will be on all Wikipedias from October 29 (calendar).- The first time you use the visual editor, pop-ups will explain why and when you should use the citation and link tools.
- You will be able to upload images to Wikimedia Commons from inside the wikitext editor by clicking "Upload" in the "Insert file" dialog. You will also be able to drag and drop them into an article when using the visual editor.
- When you edit a code block in visual editor, you will have the syntax highlighted.
- Index and Page namespaces on Wikisource will be defined as content namespaces in
$wgContentNamespaces.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Tech News: 2015-45
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now see how many editors are using a gadget on a wiki on Special:GadgetUsage.
- If you are using the mobile version of Misplaced Pages, you can now see Wikidata descriptions under article titles in search results.
- Editing conflicts are now detected when you edit on a mobile device. Before, this did not work properly on mobile.
Problems
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 3. It will be on non-Misplaced Pages wikis from November 4. It will be on all Wikipedias from November 5 (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 3 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join. You can also read the latest VisualEditor newsletter.
Future changes
- A help link will be added to Special:Search. Administrators might have to update the MediaWiki:Search-summary message to avoid two help links.
- Empty list items could be allowed in the future. If so, this could affect some templates.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
GamerGate Sanctions Notice
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.- Not sure if you got this yet (I couldn't find it in your archives), but I'm giving it to you just in case. I know you don't really need to read this but here you go.
- Also, how are things?--Jorm (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Jorm: Thanks for the ping. I had forgotten all about Gamergate. Things are going well. Glad to see you still lurking about :) Kaldari (talk) 22:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)