Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Newyorkbrad (talk | contribs) at 15:56, 11 August 2006 (typos). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• ]

Template:RFCheader

• Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style (Islam-related articles)#Manual of Style in Referencing Muhammad - There is some discussion over whether the Manual of Style should be changed to allow Muhammad to be referred to as the "Prophet Muhammad". 10:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Catflap has been suggested to be moved to Pet Door several times, as cat flap is uk-centric, not as common usage, and obviously biased towards cats, while dogs use them as well. i see no good reason to not just move the bloody thing, aside from the gang of brits on the talk page who seem to obsess over this and impose their regional POV. Joeyramoney 03:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#date_formats - concern over the wisdom of programatically changing date formats - 23:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#Interpretation - dispute over the interpretation of the MoS regarding the use of AD/CE 22:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:List of Chinese dialects - Whether the languages should be ordered by their English names or their Pinyin names. 20:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Spoiler warning/RfC - A dispute on the inclusion of spoiler templates and their effect and purpose for the encyclopedia. Massive discussions have resolved little and both sides have not yet reached an compromise. 14:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Athletics#Athletics or track and field? -- The page about running and jumping sports currently uses the "official" international name, which is all but unknown in common usage in the U.S. (where "athletics" means something completely different). Should the page keep the name Athletics, or be called Track and field? -- 22:29, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Lindy Hop and Misplaced Pages Talk:WikiProject Dance - Disagreement about whether the names of dances are proper nouns and should be capitalized. This started on the Lindy Hop article but has moved to the Dance WikiProject since it has ramifications for all dance articles. --Cswrye 14:37, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Category:Anti-Semitic people -- Whether there is a dispute or not, more specificly if the category should use the {{CategorisationDisputedPeople}} template. // 18:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Proposal for section Percentages -- Whether to write out "percent" or use symbol "%" in article body. 07:13, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Proposal for section Numbers in words -- To clarify when numbers should be spelled out in words ("twelve") and when written as numerals ("12"). 07:13, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style (links)#Proposal: Multiple linking if in different sections -- On linking more than once within an article, where appropriate, for readers jumping to a section via TOC or linked from another article or externally to a specific section, or where a topic more important later in the article than it is at the terms first usage 20:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Military history#Using operational names is a discussion on when operational names can be used to refer to military conflicts. 18:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Portal talk:Taiwan There is a dispute about whether the portal should be named Taiwan or Republic of China, though more editor consensus would be appreciated and any links to policy stating which name should be used would be helpful. 16:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Democracy (disambiguation)#Weeding the links has a current debate over articles to link to for disambiguation purposes. Even aside from any content-type issues, there is what seems to be a fairly straightforward disambiguation style problem in a top-level page like "Democracy" deep linking to a number of individual articles on the political history of a specific country (i.e. Second Party System). One editor disagrees, and more views on this are requested. - 22:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Hong Kong – on whether Hong Kong, China, an article on designation and terminology, exist, or be merged and/or be made a redirect to Hong Kong or foreign relations of Hong Kong or elsewhere. Macao, China shares similar (if not the same) situation. 13:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:Cities with the most highrise buildings – regarding how Hong Kong should be listed on the lists of cities with the most highrise buildings and cities by latitude. 13:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Talk:China - Redirect a search on "China" to China (disambiguation) page (PS: current setting is civilizational article). -- 02:30, 15 June 2006 (UTC) Straw poll ended. 20:27, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#Overriding_font-family - Should the manual of style proscribe the use of hardcoded font families (for example, in templates)? --Yath 14:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Template talk:Hong Kong (PRC) - How should Hong Kong and Macao be presented when it is necessary to mentioned their sovereignty. Similar templates include {{GUAM (US)}}, {{Åland Islands (Finland)}}, {{Cayman Islands (UK)}}, {{Jersey (UK)}}, etc. 19:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• The question is whether names of standards and protocols, or terms defined by one or more standards and protocols, should be capitalized throughout, as Border Gateway Protocol and Universal Serial Bus, or whether they should be written in lower case, excepting the proper name parts, as Chomsky normal form, extended Backus–Naur form, interior gateway protocol, random access memory, etc. Current discussion is taking place at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(capitalization)#Capitalizing_standardized_names_for_protocols,_etc. and Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(capitalization)#A_Few_Bits_Of_Data_(AFBOD). 13:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

• Use of the word American contentious article and talk page concerning whether "America/American" refer properly to the United States and its inhabitants only or to the entire New World and all who live there Sumergocognito 05:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)