This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 03:49, 25 November 2015 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Aircorn/Archive 6) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:49, 25 November 2015 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Aircorn/Archive 6) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
October 2015
Your recent editing history at Craig Joubert shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Woovee (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Jeppiz (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
I have closed the report noted above with the result that you are strongly warned not to edit war in future. I have been lenient in not blocking you, and this will not be repeated in future. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk: Craig Joubert
This behaviour is not suitable because this breaks the discussion. The headline of this new topic has to be withdrawn and the reply has to be included in the previous topic. Thanks. If not, I'm going to report this to the administrator. Woovee (talk) 22:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- I don't see how this is a problem to be honest and since two other editors have also replied I don't think moving it is a good idea. AIRcorn (talk) 22:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)