This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Quill E. Coyote (talk | contribs) at 04:54, 16 August 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:54, 16 August 2006 by Quill E. Coyote (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Inappropriate warning from Tasc
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- tasc deeds 06:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Appropriate reminder from Isopropyl
When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. -Isopropyl 06:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Why Helo Thar
I notice you've entered an opposition in my Request for adminship, mentioning something about my violating the 3RR. Unfortunately, I don't recall any such incident. Have you mistaken me for another user? -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 03:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I still don't know what you mean. Again, please check out and respond to the questions in the RfA. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll keep checking it out. No need to post here everytime you want me to respond. Quill E. Coyote 04:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Quill, if you continue trolling and being disruptive on the RfA, I will block you for disruption. JoshuaZ 04:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Every user with an account has a right to vote in RfAs, and it behooves them to back up the reasoning behind their vote when requested. I've done nothing wrong. Quill E. Coyote 04:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Your behavior on the RfA is borderline disruptive if not outright disruptive. You are picking an (essentially random) RfA candidate out of dozens and opposing that candidate because they didn't get involved in one case that might have lead up to a 3RR violation. JoshuaZ 04:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- He's admitted that he was aware of the potential violation, yet did nothing to help the situation out. That's not becoming of an administrator. Quill E. Coyote 04:54, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Your behavior on the RfA is borderline disruptive if not outright disruptive. You are picking an (essentially random) RfA candidate out of dozens and opposing that candidate because they didn't get involved in one case that might have lead up to a 3RR violation. JoshuaZ 04:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)