This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dominic (talk | contribs) at 23:59, 9 July 2006 (moved Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Sathya to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba: The case is named after an article, so it doesn't make sense to shorten it to a sigle wrd with a different meaning.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:59, 9 July 2006 by Dominic (talk | contribs) (moved Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Sathya to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba: The case is named after an article, so it doesn't make sense to shorten it to a sigle wrd with a different meaning.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Outside view of jossi
- Moved from main page
I have followed this dispute for quite sometime. In fact I solicited mediation on their behalf which they accepted. It is my opinion that further mediation will not result in any substantial movement forward in this dispute between Andries and SSS108, given the long history between these two editors. A user conduct RfC on Andries could be explored, although I doubt that this will resolve the dispute between them. An possible alternative would be that the ArbCom take this case and allow for the evidence phase to take place, in which the community can provide the same type of comments/feedback as it would be raised on a user conduct RfC, with the additional advantage that it could resolve the dispute between them, once and for all. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 17:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)